Suction, flexion, and noise profile of three flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths: a benchtop comparison
Connor A. Church, Elijah Haynal, Ye Jean Lim, Ye Na Diana Lim, Frankis Almaguel, Elizabeth A. Baldwin, Ruben Crew, Matthew Buell, Ali Albaghli, D. Duane Baldwin

TL;DR
This study compares three flexible suction ureteral access sheaths in a lab model to determine their performance in stone removal and maneuverability.
Contribution
The study provides a direct benchtop comparison of three FANS devices, revealing differences in suction efficiency, deflection, and noise.
Findings
Hoover and ClearPetra FANS outperformed Vathin in stone suction across all kidney trials.
ClearPetra had the highest suction flow rates and was the quietest during operation.
Hoover and Vathin showed greater deflection and lower deflection control force compared to ClearPetra.
Abstract
Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) have revolutionized treatment of urinary stones, and we hypothesized that different sheaths may have different functional characteristics. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 different FANS in a benchtop kidney/ureter model. Three 12/14 Fr FANS were compared in a 3D-printed silicon kidney/ureter model: Dornier Hoover, Wellead ClearPetra, and Vathin. Randomized stone-suction trials were done in the upper, interpolar, and lower poles. Maximum deflection using 6.3 and 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopes, deflection control force, suction flow rates, and noise levels were also compared. Hoover and ClearPetra FANS suctioned more fragments than Vathin when all kidney trials were considered (p < 0.01 for all). Comparing deflection, Hoover and Vathin had greater downward deflection compared to ClearPetra for both ureteroscopes (p…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments · Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies · Ureteral procedures and complications
