# Prognostic Value of Lymph-Node Micrometastases and Isolated Tumour Cells in Gastric Cancer

**Authors:** José Couto, Mariana Leite, João Mendes, Cláudia Lima, Inês Arnaud, Fábio Correia Viveiros, Ana Cristina Rodrigues

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.102007 · Cureus · 2026-01-21

## TL;DR

This study examines the role of lymph-node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in gastric cancer and their impact on patient survival.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the prognostic value of IHC-detected lymph-node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in gastric cancer patients.

## Key findings

- Micrometastases and isolated tumor cells were found in 18.6% of patients.
- The presence of ITC+/Mic+ was associated with lower survival in patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy.
- Routine IHC assessment for these features is not recommended for all patients.

## Abstract

Background

Lymph node status is a crucial prognostic determinant in gastric cancer (GC). Conventional haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) assessment overlooks the micro volume of nodal disease. This study explored the prevalence and prognostic significance of lymph-node micrometastases (Mic) and isolated tumour cells (ITC) detected by cytokeratin AE1/AE3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in patients undergoing gastrectomy with curative intent.

Methods

A retrospective, single-centre analysis of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated between 2014 and 2019 by curative intent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and with IHC assessment of lymph nodes (LN). Nodal involvement was classified as macrometastases (>2 mm), Mic (>0.2-2 mm), or ITC (≤0.2 mm). Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were obtained from the institutional database. Data were analysed using χ²/Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon tests. Overall survival (OS) was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

Results

Eighty-six patients were included (mean age 67.2±11.2 years). A total of 1,974 lymph nodes were examined (mean 22.95±7.43 per patient): 256 (12.97%) contained macrometastases, 21 (1.06%) Mic and 31 (1.57%) ITC. Sixteen patients (18.6%) had Mic and/or ITC (ITC+/Mic+). Tumours larger than 20 mm with lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with the presence of ITC+/Mic+. In node-negative (pN0) patients, IHC uncovered occult nodal disease in six cases (13.6%). In the overall cohort, five-year OS was 55.8%, and the presence of ITC+/Mic+ did not significantly affect OS across tumour, nodes, metastases (TNM) and pathological lymph node (pN) categories. In the subgroup treated with perioperative chemotherapy, the presence of ITC+/Mic+ was associated with a lower five-year OS (p=0.023). OS was comparable between pN0 patients with ITC+/Mic+ and those with node-positive (pN1) disease (p=0.624).

Conclusion

Micrometastases and ITC are detected in a relevant proportion of gastric cancer patients and are associated with adverse pathological features, but they did not independently influence OS in this clinical cohort. Their prognostic impact might be relevant in patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy. Routine IHC assessment is not sustained by these data and may be better suited for selected high-risk patients.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** gastric cancer (MONDO:0001056)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** TENM1 (teneurin transmembrane protein 1) [NCBI Gene 10178] {aka ODZ1, ODZ3, TEN-M1, TEN1, TNM, TNM1}, NODAL (nodal growth differentiation factor) [NCBI Gene 4838] {aka HTX5}
- **Diseases:** ITC (MESH:D018295), GC (MESH:D013274), Nodal disease (MESH:D004194), Node (MESH:D012804), occult (MESH:D005596), Tumour (MESH:D009369), Lymph node (MESH:D000072717), Lymph node metastasis (MESH:D008207), positive (MESH:D000377), Mic (MESH:D061206), TNM (MESH:D009362)
- **Chemicals:** biotin (MESH:D001710), ethanol (MESH:D000431), paraffin (MESH:D010232), xylene (MESH:D014992), eosin (MESH:D004801), formalin (MESH:D005557), hydrogen peroxide (MESH:D006861), H&amp;E (-), H&amp;E (MESH:D006371), haematoxylin (MESH:D006416)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923174/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923174/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923174/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923174