# Influence of different layout of rigid and flexible structures on methane explosion in oil and gas gathering and transportation station

**Authors:** Weifeng Duan, Shitong Liu, Kan Du, Yulong Duan, Huaixu Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342568 · PLOS One · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

This study examines how flexible structures can reduce methane explosion risks in oil and gas stations by analyzing their layout and effectiveness compared to rigid structures.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel experimental approach to assess flexible facility layouts for mitigating methane explosion impacts in oil and gas stations.

## Key findings

- Flame front velocity and overpressure increase with higher blockage rates of flexible structures.
- Smaller spacing between flexible and rigid structures improves explosion protection when blockage rates are equal or lower.
- Higher blockage rates in flexible structures with smaller spacing can worsen explosions.

## Abstract

Oil and gas gathering and transportation station is the core hub of oil and gas production, processing and transportation. Its safe operation is directly related to the stability of energy supply and the safety of personnel and property. To solve the problems of high explosion risk, limited overpressure attenuation and facilities vulnerable to explosion impact damage caused by rigid facilities in the oil and gas gathering and transportation station, based on the small-scale explosion experimental platform, this paper studies the space protection technology of flexible facilities, and discusses the gas explosion-proof effect of different sizes of flexible facilities in front of rigid facilities. The experimental results show that in most cases, the flame front velocity and flame explosion overpressure are positively correlated with the blockage rate of the flexible structure; When the blockage rate of flexible structure is less than or equal to the blockage rate of rigid structure, the flame velocity and explosion overpressure decrease with the decrease of the spacing, and the explosion protection effect is better; When the blockage rate of flexible structure is greater than the blockage rate of rigid structure, the smaller spacing may aggravate the explosion. The research results help to clarify the influence mechanism of flexible protective facilities on natural gas explosion pressure and flame characteristics, reveal the protection mechanism of flexible protective facilities on rigid facilities, and provide theoretical basis and scientific guidance for the protection layout design of rigid facilities and natural gas explosion protection technology in oil and gas gathering and transportation station.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** methane (PubChem CID 297)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** explosion (MESH:D007174)
- **Chemicals:** hydrogen (MESH:D006859), polyurethane (MESH:D011140), Methane (MESH:D008697), carbon (MESH:D002244), Oil (MESH:D009821), PVC (MESH:D011143), platinum (MESH:D010984)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923030/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923030/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923030/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12923030