# A systematic review and equity analysis of school-based violence prevention interventions evaluated in randomised controlled trials

**Authors:** Emily Eldred, Karen Devries, Kate A. Nelson, Anja Zinke-Allmang, Charles Opondo, Waliyah Mughis, Rizwana Mallick, Lena Morgon Banks, Amiya Bhatia

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-26142-1 · BMC Public Health · 2026-01-28

## TL;DR

This study reviews school-based violence prevention programs to see if they work equally well for all students, especially those from minoritized or high-risk groups.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a systematic equity analysis of school violence prevention interventions using RCTs, highlighting gaps in subgroup effectiveness reporting.

## Key findings

- Most trials do not report effectiveness for minoritized or high-risk children.
- Subgroup analyses showed mixed results with some evidence of heterogeneity.
- Few interventions measured outcomes by disability, sexuality, race/ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.

## Abstract

Experiencing violence in school is a violation of a child’s rights and can increase school absence, affect academic achievement, employment prospects, and later-life health. Effective school-based violence prevention interventions are crucial, however, most are universally targeted. It is less clear if current interventions to prevent violence in schools ensure subgroups of children benefit equitably.

We conducted a systematic review. We drew on professional networks and searched Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, and Web of Science to identify systematic reviews (n = 29) which included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based violence prevention interventions. Reviews conducted searches until December 2023. We screened all included articles within the final review sample to identify all RCTs of universal school-based violence prevention interventions. We examined what sociodemographic characteristics were measured, assessed intervention effectiveness by subgroups, and applied criteria to assess equity.

Out of 160 articles of RCTs evaluating violence prevention interventions in schools, we identified 19 articles reporting on 16 trials that reported effects by the following subgroups: sex (n = 16), disability (n = 1), sexuality (n = 1), race/ethnicity (n = 1) and socioeconomic status (n = 1). Subgroup and moderation analysis found mixed results of intervention effectiveness by subgroups, with some evidence of heterogeneity.

Most trials of school-based violence prevention interventions do not report whether they are effective for subgroups of minoritised children, or children at higher risk of experiencing violence, and therefore may not contribute to advancing health equity. Ensuring a commitment to equity in the design, delivery, and impact of school-based violence prevention is essential to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

PROSPERO: CRD42023463384.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-025-26142-1.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** physical violence (MESH:D059445), sexual violence (MESH:D050035), emotional violence (MESH:D003072), disabilities (MESH:D009069)
- **Chemicals:** AZA (MESH:D001379), EE (MESH:D004997)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922353/full.md

## References

9 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922353/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922353