# A Comparison of Centroid Tracking and Image Phase for Improved Optokinetic Nystagmus Detection

**Authors:** Jason Turuwhenua, Mohammad Norouzifard, Zaw LinTun, Misty Edmonds, Rebecca Findlay, Joanna Black, Benjamin Thompson

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jemr19010012 · Journal of Eye Movement Research · 2026-01-26

## TL;DR

This study compares different methods for detecting optokinetic nystagmus to improve accuracy over existing commercial tools.

## Contribution

The study introduces centroid tracking and image-phase-based techniques as alternatives to improve OKN detection.

## Key findings

- Centroid tracking and image-phase methods outperformed the commercial gaze signal in sensitivity and accuracy.
- MMIC methods showed consistent improvement in retest scenarios where centroid tracking failed.
- Only centroid tracking improved specificity compared to the commercial method.

## Abstract

Optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) is an involuntary sawtooth eye movement that occurs in the presence of a drifting stimulus. Our experience is that low-amplitude/short-duration OKN can challenge the limits of our commercially available Pupil Neon eye-tracker, leading to false negative OKN detection results. We sought to investigate whether such instances could be remediated. We compared automated OKN detection using: (1) the gaze signal from the Pupil Neon (OKN-G), (2) centroid tracking (OKN-C), and (3) an image-phase-based “motion microscopy” technique (OKN-MMIC). The OKN-C and OKN-MMIC methods were also tested as a remediated step after a negative OKN-G result (OKN-C-STEP, OKN-MMIC-STEP). To validate the approaches adults (n = 22) with normal visual acuity was measured whilst viewing trials of an OKN induction stimulus shown at four levels of visibility. Confusion matrices and performance measures were determined for a “main” dataset that included all methods, and a “retest” set, which contained instances where centroid tracking failed. For the main set, all tested methods improved upon OKN-G by Matthew’s correlation coefficient (0.80–0.85 vs. 0.76), sensitivity (0.89–0.95 vs. 0.85), and accuracy (0.91–0.93 vs. 0.88); but only OKN-C yielded better specificity (0.90–0.96 vs. 0.95). For the retest set, MMIC and MMIC-STEP methods consistently improved upon the performance of OKN-G across all measures.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** involuntary eye movement (MESH:D020820), involuntary (MESH:D014202), ocular motility problems (MESH:D015835), OKN (MESH:D009759), injury to (MESH:D014947)
- **Chemicals:** OKN-C (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922098/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922098/full.md

## References

56 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922098/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12922098