# Progressively Increased Range of Motion Confers Similar Strength Improvements but Not Bar Kinematics as Full Range of Motion Bench Press

**Authors:** Michael J. Landram, Patrick Manturi, Mark Zipagan, Emily E. Gerstle

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jfmk11010072 · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · 2026-02-11

## TL;DR

This study compares full and partial range of motion bench press training and finds both improve strength similarly, but only full range affects bar movement patterns.

## Contribution

Shows supramaximal partial ROM training can match full ROM for strength gains in experienced lifters.

## Key findings

- Both training methods significantly increased 1RM strength after 4 weeks.
- Only full ROM training improved specific bar kinematic variables like velocity and force.
- Partial ROM training did not alter bar movement patterns during the eccentric-concentric transition.

## Abstract

Background: Full versus partial range of motion (ROM) bench press (BP) training has only been investigated at submaximal loads with discrete joint angles during training. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a 4-week supramaximal progressive partial ROM (pROM) BP program to a traditional submaximal full range of motion (fROM) program on 1-RM strength and bar kinematics. Methods: Sixteen resistance-trained males (22.2 ± 1.4 years, 180.1 ± 6.3 cm, 88.5 ± 8.6 kgs, 1RM ≥ 1.25× body mass, 6 years’ experience) were randomized into pROM (n = 7) or fROM (n = 9). The pROM group performed BP at 105% 1RM using Bench Blokz to decrease the distance from the bar to the sternum by 1″ increments each week (5″ to 2″). The fROM group followed a strength oriented linear periodization model (80–87.5% 1RM). Both 1RM strength and 3D kinematics were assessed pre- and post-intervention using a 2 × 2 (Group × Time) ANOVA with Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons. Results: Both groups significantly increased 1RM strength (F = 45.82, p < 0.001), with no significant differences between groups. Pairwise comparisons revealed that only the fROM group experienced significant increases in 1st peak velocity (p = 0.023), eccentric velocity (p = 0.009), mean concentric force (p = 0.04) and quartile 2 mean concentric force (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Supramaximal pROM training is an effective strategy for increasing 1RM strength in experienced lifters, yielding results comparable to traditional fROM training over the course of a 4-week strength block. However, there are notable changes in bar kinematics surrounding the eccentric-concentric phase change that were only observed after fROM training.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** musculoskeletal deviations (MESH:D009140), overuse injury (MESH:D012090), injury to (MESH:D014947), pROM (MESH:D009041)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438), 6RM (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921985/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921985/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921985