# How Healthcare Professionals Perceive Emergency Pediatric Care Provision in Two Public Hospitals in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Study

**Authors:** Eleni Vathi, Konstantinos Petsios, Evangelos Dousis, Ioannis Koutelekos, Despoina Koumpagioti, Eirini Anastasopoulou, Anastasia Ntikoudi, Eugenia Vlachou, Eleni Evangelou

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/pediatric18010027 · Pediatric Reports · 2026-02-05

## TL;DR

Healthcare professionals in Greek hospitals perceive gaps in emergency pediatric care, particularly in waiting times, child-friendly settings, and information sharing.

## Contribution

The study evaluates how healthcare professionals perceive the quality of emergency pediatric care and identifies barriers to child-centered practices.

## Key findings

- Healthcare professionals agree with quality principles but report a significant gap in their implementation.
- Main barriers include workload, poor coordination, and lack of resources.
- Perceived safety scores were higher than organizational care scores.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: High-quality pediatric emergency care requires timely access, effective communication, privacy, pain management, comfort, and child- and family-centered practices; however, implementation may be constrained by several barriers. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of pediatric emergency care as perceived by healthcare professionals, with emphasis on child-centered care and variations based on workplace and professional characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in the emergency departments in two tertiary public pediatric hospitals in Athens, Greece. A study-developed 14-item Quality of Care Assessment Scale with paired ratings of agreement with quality principles and implementation in practice was completed by 162 professionals (122 doctors, 24 nurses, 16 assistant nurses). Independent items evaluated perceived barriers, overall assessments (0–100), and information provided to parents/children (5-point Likert scale). Inferential tests and descriptive statistics were also used (p < 0.05). Results: There was a significant degree of agreement with quality principles, but there was a constant lack of implementation (principle–practice gap). The primary perceived weakness was waiting times; child-friendly settings and privacy during examinations and information-giving were also lacking. Internal consistency ranged from good to acceptable (implementation α = 0.800; agreement α = 0.711). Children were most frequently rated as “moderately informed” (48.1%), while parents were most frequently rated as “quite informed” (50.0%). Compared to the organization of care (mean 60.85), perceived safety was higher (mean 73.27). Perceptions varied by age, educational level, profession, department, shift rotations, and hospital. The main barriers were workload (30.2%), poor coordination (34.0%), and lack of resources (46.9%). Conclusions: Health professionals seem to perceive that consistent delivery of child-centered care is impaired by organizational and structural limitations. Reducing the standards-to-practice gap requires targeted system-level interventions that focus on staffing, care organization, environment, and professional support.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), pain (MESH:D010146), injury to (MESH:D014947), fatigue (MESH:D005221), compassion fatigue (MESH:D000068376), death (MESH:D003643)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921908/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921908/full.md

## References

59 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921908/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921908