# Cross-Education Effects After Submaximal and Supramaximal Accentuated Eccentric Loading on Lean Mass and Function in Women

**Authors:** Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo, Miguel Lauría-Martínez, Kayvan Khoramipour, Irati Jauregui-Fajardo, Paula Redondo-Delgado, José Antonio de Paz, David García-López

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jfmk11010063 · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · 2026-01-31

## TL;DR

This study found that both submaximal and supramaximal eccentric loading training improved muscle mass and function in women's trained and untrained legs, with slight differences in specific outcomes.

## Contribution

The study compares submaximal and supramaximal accentuated eccentric loading effects on lean mass and function in women, revealing nuanced differences in neuromuscular adaptations.

## Key findings

- Both submaximal and supramaximal AEL improved lean mass and function in trained and non-trained legs.
- Supramaximal loading increased mechanical power and lean mass more than submaximal loading.
- Submaximal loading improved explosive performance, while supramaximal loading enhanced endurance and lean mass.

## Abstract

Objective: This study compared the effects of submaximal and supramaximal accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) on lean mass and function in the trained (TL) and contralateral non-trained (NTL) legs of women. Methods: Twenty recreationally trained women were randomly assigned to submaximal (90% 1-RM) or supramaximal (120% 1-RM) AEL leg press training (2/week, 10 weeks, 4 sets of 8 repetitions) with 30% 1-RM concentric loading. Total thigh lean mass (TTLM), unilateral leg press 1-RM, mechanical power at 40% (P40), 60% (P60), and 80% (P80) of 1-RM, unilateral countermovement (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) height, and muscle endurance (XRM) were assessed for each leg before and after intervention. Results: Regarding the TL, the submaximal group showed significant (p < 0.05) increases in 1-RM, P40, CMJ, and DJ, while the supramaximal group showed increased TTLM, 1-RM, P40, P60, and XRM. No significant differences were observed between groups. In the NTL, both groups showed significant increases in 1-RM and P40. Additionally, the submaximal group demonstrated improvements in P60, while the supramaximal group showed significant increases in both P60 and P80, and in TTLM. TL and NTL changes correlated significantly for 1-RM, CMJ, and TTLM. However, TL and NTL changes differed significantly for 1-RM and P40 in the submaximal group and for TTLM in the supramaximal group. Conclusions: Submaximal and supramaximal AEL resulted in similar neuromuscular improvements in both TL and NTL in women. Supramaximal loading provided additional benefits in mechanical power lean mass, while submaximal loading improved explosive performance. Supramaximal loading may not be necessary for active women.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** TTN (titin) [NCBI Gene 7273] {aka CMD1G, CMH9, CMPD4, CMYO5, CMYP5, EOMFC}
- **Diseases:** hypertrophy (MESH:D006984), muscle, joint, or bone injuries (MESH:D001847), CMJ (MESH:C000711648), injury to (MESH:D014947), pain (MESH:D010146), DJ (MESH:D020427), musculoskeletal injuries (MESH:D009140), TTLM (MESH:D013851), Muscle Soreness (MESH:D063806), hypertrophic (MESH:D002312)
- **Chemicals:** AEL (-), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921896/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921896/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921896/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12921896