# Antibody Avidity Profiles as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Differentiating Acute and Chronic Anisakis simplex—Related Allergic Diseases

## TL;DR

This study shows that antibody avidity profiles can help distinguish between acute and chronic forms of anisakiasis, an allergic disease caused by Anisakis simplex larvae.

## Contribution

The study introduces antibody avidity indices as novel biomarkers for differentiating acute and chronic anisakiasis.

## Key findings

- GAA patients had lower IgE avidity indices compared to CU+ individuals.
- IgG4 and IgG avidity were higher in GAA, indicating an active immune response.
- IgE avidity increased over time in GAA patients during follow-up.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Allergic features of anisakiasis, caused by ingestion of third-stage larvae of Anisakis simplex via raw or undercooked fish, manifest clinically as acute gastroallergic anisakiasis (GAA) or chronic urticaria with Anisakis sensitization (CU+). Differentiating these clinical phenotypes remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the maturation and avidity of specific antibodies (IgE, IgG4, IgG, and IgA) as biomarkers for discriminating between acute and chronic forms of anisakiasis. Methods: A prospective cohort of 65 patients from Madrid, Spain, was classified into three groups: GAA (n = 22), CU+ (n = 22), and chronic urticaria without sensitization (CU−, n = 21). Serum samples were analyzed for antigen-specific immunoglobulins using ELISA and Western blot. Avidity indices (AIs) were quantified through urea dissociation assays. Statistical comparisons and correlation analyses were performed to associate antibody avidity with clinical phenotype and demographic variables. Results: GAA patients exhibited significantly lower IgE avidity indices compared to CU+ individuals (mean AI: 79.9% vs. 88.5%), indicating a less mature IgE response during acute infection. Conversely, IgG4 and IgG avidity were elevated in GAA relative to CU+, reflecting an active but transient immune response. IgA antibodies were detected in both groups, although avidity differences lacked discriminatory capacity. No sex- or age-related differences in antibody avidity were observed. Longitudinal follow-up of GAA patients demonstrated an increase in IgE avidity over time. Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of antibody avidity, particularly for IgE and IgG4, enhances understanding of A. simplex immunopathogenesis and serves as a valuable biomarker for distinguishing acute from chronic clinical presentations. These findings support the use of avidity indices in the diagnosis, staging, and clinical management of anisakiasis.