# Comparison of Automatic Segmentation and Preprocessing Approaches for Dynamic Total-Body 3D Pet Images with Different Pet Tracers

**Authors:** Maria K. Jaakkola, Marcela Xiomara Rivera Pineda, Rafael Díaz, Maria Rantala, Anna Jalo, Henri Kärpijoki, Teemu Saari, Teemu Maaniitty, Thomas Keller, Heli Louhi, Saara Wahlroos, Merja Haaparanta-Solin, Olof Solin, Jaakko Hentilä, Jatta S. Helin, Tuuli A. Nissinen, Olli Eskola, Johan Rajander, Juhani Knuuti, Kirsi A. Virtanen, Jarna C. Hannukainen, Francisco López-Picón, Riku Klén

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s10278-025-01540-4 · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · 2025-05-27

## TL;DR

This study compares automatic methods for segmenting large total-body PET images and finds that some clustering techniques work better than others.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the feasibility of unsupervised segmentation methods for modern large-scale PET images and identifies promising techniques.

## Key findings

- Only 6 out of 17 segmentation methods were computationally usable for modern PET images.
- GMM and k-means achieved median Jaccard indices of 0.58 across different organ segments.
- Preprocessing improved results, but small organs remained challenging to segment.

## Abstract

Segmentation is a routine step in PET image analysis, and few automatic tools have been developed for it. However, excluding supervised methods with their own limitations, they are typically designed for older, small images and the implementations are no longer publicly available. Here, we test if different commonly used building blocks of the automatic methods work with large modern total-body PET images. Dynamic total-body images from five different datasets are used for evaluation purposes, and the tested algorithms cover wide range of different preprocessing approaches and unsupervised segmentation methods. The validation is done by comparing the obtained segments to manually drawn ones using Jaccard index, Dice score, precision, and recall as measures of match. Out of the 17 considered segmentation methods, only 6 were computationally usable and provided enough segments for the needs of this study. Among these six feasible methods, hierarchical clustering and HDBSCAN had systematically the lowest Jaccard indices with the manual segmentations, whereas both GMM and k-means had median Jaccards of 0.58 over different organ segments and data sets. GMM outperformed k-means in human data, but with rat images, the two methods had equally good performance k-means having slightly stronger precision and GMM recall. We conclude that most of the commonly used unsupervised segmentation methods are computationally infeasible with the modern PET images, classical clustering algorithms k-means and especially Gaussian mixture model being the most promising candidates for further method development. Even though preprocessing, particularly denoising, improved the results, small organs remained difficult to segment.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10278-025-01540-4.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920958/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920958/full.md

## References

13 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920958/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920958