# DNA Recovery from Forensically Relevant Blow Fly Larvae (Insecta, Diptera, Calliphoridae) Kept in Different Preservative Solutions

**Authors:** José Lucas Dias-Silva, Orianna Tamara, Andrés F. Maya-Duque, Eduardo Amat, Luz Miryam Gomez-Piñerez, João Vitor Almeida-Santos, Carina Mara Souza, Tais Madeira-Ott, Aline Marrara Prado, Patricia Jacqueline Thyssen

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s13744-026-01366-x · Neotropical Entomology · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

This study examines how different preservatives affect DNA recovery from blow fly larvae used in forensic investigations, finding that high-concentration ethanol is most effective.

## Contribution

The study identifies optimal preservative solutions for DNA preservation in forensically important blow fly larvae.

## Key findings

- 99.3% and 70% ethanol yielded the highest DNA with successful amplification rates up to 28 days.
- Kahle’s solution failed to produce amplifiable DNA regardless of storage duration.
- DNA quality declined significantly after 47 days of storage in all preservatives except 70–99.3% ethanol.

## Abstract

There are still many gaps in knowledge about how different preservative solutions can guarantee sufficient DNA recovery for the taxonomic determination of flies of forensic importance. In the present study, we evaluated the recovery and amplification rates of mitochondrial DNA from larvae of the forensically important blow fly Chrysomya megacephala (F.) (Diptera, Calliphoridae), preserved for up to 47 days in the solutions commonly used in routine forensic investigations. Some larvae (N = 88) were immediately placed in the preservative solution, while another group of larvae (N = 88) was killed by immersion in water heated up to 80 °C for 30 s before being preserved at room temperature. In general, it was possible to recover highly pure DNA from larvae subjected to almost all treatments, with yields varying proportionally across different storage intervals. Among the solutions that yielded the highest DNA and consequently achieved successful amplification rates were 99.3% ethanol (> 100 ng/µL, with rates of 95%) and 70% ethanol (20–100 ng/µL, with rates of 90%), primarily up to the 28-day storage interval. The worst DNA yields and low amplification rates (approximately 50%) were associated with the 47-day storage interval, despite the preservative method used, except for Kahle’s solution, which presents no amplification at all. Our results suggest that ethanol at concentrations of 70–99.3% is the most efficient preservative for preserving the integrity and usability of forensically important larvae DNA for diagnostic purposes, particularly within a range of up to 28 days.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13744-026-01366-x.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ethanol (PubChem CID 702)
- **Species:** Chrysomya megacephala (taxon 115424)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** methanol (MESH:D000432), MgCl2 (MESH:D015636), sugar (MESH:D000073893), xylene (MESH:D014992), water (MESH:D014867), phenol (MESH:D019800), isopropyl alcohol (MESH:D019840), acetic acid (MESH:D019342), Ethanol (MESH:D000431), Kahle (-), camphor oil (MESH:D002164), AMP (MESH:D000249), agarose (MESH:D012685), Formaldehyde (MESH:D005557)
- **Species:** Chrysomya megacephala (oriental latrine fly, species) [taxon 115424], Muscidae (house flies, family) [taxon 7366], Hexapoda (hexapods, subphylum) [taxon 6960], Chrysomya putoria (tropical African latrine blowfly, species) [taxon 235600], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Musca domestica (house fly, species) [taxon 7370], Diptera (flies, order) [taxon 7147], Calliphoridae (blow flies, family) [taxon 7371], Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, species) [taxon 7227]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920309/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920309/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920309/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12920309