# The Ticking Clock: Differential Time‐Dependent Deterioration Between Washed and Thawed Sperm

## TL;DR

This study shows thawed sperm deteriorates faster than fresh sperm over time, suggesting thawed sperm should be used immediately for better reproductive results.

## Contribution

The novel finding is that thawed sperm deteriorates more rapidly than fresh sperm in multiple key parameters, including DNA fragmentation.

## Key findings

- Thawed sperm showed significantly greater declines in motility and vitality compared to fresh sperm.
- DNA fragmentation increased only in thawed sperm, reaching clinically critical levels.
- Motility in thawed sperm declined abruptly, unlike the gradual decline in fresh sperm.

## Abstract

Cryopreservation is widely used in assisted reproductive technologies. While fresh sperm undergoes gradual time‐dependent deterioration, it remains unclear whether thawed sperm exhibits a more accelerated decline.

To directly compare the rate of deterioration in sperm motility, vitality, and DNA fragmentation between fresh washed and thawed sperm samples over time.

This prospective study included semen samples from 50 males. Samples were split into two groups: Washed (freshly washed sperm) and Thawed (washed, cryopreserved for at least 2 weeks, and thawed). Sperm parameters, including motility, vitality, and DNA fragmentation index (DFI), were assessed immediately after processing (Time 1) and again after 75 min incubation at room temperature (Time 2). Additionally, control experiments tested whether cryoprotectant exposure alone could account for deterioration by comparing washed samples incubated with washing versus freezing medium (10 patient samples), and by assessing post‐thaw washing (10 donor samples).

Total sperm motility declined significantly more in thawed samples (29 ± 16%) compared to fresh washed samples (17 ± 9%, p < 0.0001). Vitality similarly deteriorated more in thawed samples (21 ± 14%) versus fresh washed samples (7 ± 5%, p < 0.0001). DNA fragmentation increased significantly only in thawed samples (p = 0.0331), reaching clinically critical levels (mean DFI 34 ± 13% at Time 2), compared to fresh samples which remained within normal range (12 ± 5%). Motility grade transitions differed markedly, with thawed samples showing direct transitions from Grade A motility to immotility, unlike fresh washed samples, which transitioned gradually from Grade A to Grade B. In additional control experiments, cryoprotectant exposure alone did not induce deterioration, and post‐thaw washing did not improve metrics.

Thawed sperm exhibited accelerated deterioration across all measured parameters, highlighting cumulative stress from cryopreservation. The rapid decline underscores the need to minimize the interval between thawing and insemination.

Thawed spermatozoa demonstrate significantly greater susceptibility to time‐dependent deterioration compared to fresh washed samples, advocating for immediate use post‐thaw to optimize reproductive outcomes.