# Quantifying roadless areas and fragmentation in the context of wildlife-vehicle collision risk in Great Britain

**Authors:** Sarah Raymond, Elizabeth A. Chadwick, Sarah E. Perkins

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36410-8 · Scientific Reports · 2026-02-18

## TL;DR

This study maps roadless areas in Great Britain to assess wildlife-vehicle collision risks and habitat fragmentation.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a new method to quantify roadless patches and their ecological significance for conservation.

## Key findings

- Roadless patches are numerous and small, with over 60% smaller than the home ranges of common UK species.
- Nearly half of roadless areas overlap with protected land, but patch size correlates weakly with ecological status.
- The study provides an open-access map of roadless areas to aid conservation and defragmentation efforts.

## Abstract

Roads cause indirect and direct effects for wildlife, including pollution, behavioural changes, wildlife mortality and habitat fragmentation. The ecological impacts of roads extend beyond their immediate vicinity, into ‘road effect zones’. Beyond road effect zones, ‘roadless areas’ can offer refuges from the ecological effects of roads. In this study, we quantify the number and distribution of roadless patches in Great Britain, their ecological status and their overlap with protected areas. Road effect zones applied 100, 500 and 1,000 m on either side of the road network revealed a highly fragmented landscape with 93,561, 29,164 and 6,138 roadless patches, covering 76.6%, 36.0% and 20.6% of terrestrial land, respectively. Roadless areas were smallest, on average, in England and largest in Scotland. For all road effect zones, more than 70% of patches were smaller than 1 km2. For the most commonly used road effect zone (1 km), more than 60% of roadless patches were smaller than the mean home range of common UK species, European badger Meles meles and red fox Vulpes vulpes, meaning they likely face a high risk of wildlife-vehicle collisions. Nearly half (47%) of roadless areas coincided with protected land and there was a weak but significant negative relationship between roadless patch size and ecological status. In conclusion, the landscape is fragmented into numerous, small roadless patches. We present roadless areas and their ecological features as an open access searchable map, constituting a tool for conservation practitioners and an important starting point for defragmentation campaigns.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-36410-8.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Meles meles (taxon 9662), Vulpes vulpes (taxon 9627)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** carbon (MESH:D002244), WVC (-)
- **Species:** Muntiacus reevesi (Chinese muntjac, species) [taxon 9886], Meles meles (Eurasian badger, species) [taxon 9662], Capreolus capreolus (Western roe deer, species) [taxon 9858], Mustela putorius (European polecat, species) [taxon 9668], Vulpes vulpes (red fox, species) [taxon 9627], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Sciurus carolinensis (eastern gray squirrel, species) [taxon 30640], Oryctolagus cuniculus (domestic rabbit, species) [taxon 9986], Erinaceus europaeus (common hedgehog, species) [taxon 9365], Haliclona sp. ARE (species) [taxon 1804645]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917188/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917188/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917188/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917188