# Beyond hostility: exploring facial emotion recognition biases in youths with conduct disorder

**Authors:** Janine Bacher, Beryll von Planta, Anka Bernhard, Graeme Fairchild, Lucres Jansen, Stephane A. De Brito, Christine M. Freitag, Kerstin Konrad, Christina Stadler, Gregor Kohls, Eva Unternaehrer

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00787-025-02846-y · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025-08-27

## TL;DR

This study shows that youths with conduct disorder misinterpret facial emotions, especially at low intensities, not just anger.

## Contribution

The study expands beyond hostile attribution bias to examine FER biases across six basic emotions in youths with conduct disorder.

## Key findings

- Youths with CD showed stronger FER biases than controls across all emotions.
- FER biases in CD youths varied with intensity, being weaker at higher intensities.
- CD youths misclassify emotions at low intensities regardless of emotion type.

## Abstract

Facial emotion recognition (FER) biases refer to systematic tendencies to recognize specific emotions when processing facial expressions. In youths with conduct disorder (CD), who are characterized by highly impairing antisocial behavior, research on FER biases has focused on hostile attribution biases. This work has shown that youths with CD perceive ambiguous social cues as angry. However, youths with CD may not only show biases towards anger, which is why we investigated FER biases in youths with CD towards the six basic emotions. Within the European FemNAT-CD study, we analyzed data from 610 youths with CD (60% female) and 818 typically developing controls (TDCs; 68% female), aged 9 to 18 years (M = 14.1, SD = 2.41 years). FER biases were assessed using the Emotion Hexagon Task by showing morphed emotional expressions and asking participants to choose the predominant emotion. Biases were calculated as tendency towards an emotion shown at 0%, 10%, 30%, or 50% intensity. Our findings from hierarchical linear modelling indicate that youths with CD exhibited stronger FER biases than TDCs across all emotions, meaning that they misclassified each emotion more often. However, this difference varied by intensity, with youths with CD displaying weaker biases at higher intensity levels and a smaller increase in bias with increasing intensity level. Our findings indicate that youths with CD not only show a hostile attribution bias but rather misclassify emotions as predominant when they are present at low intensity, regardless of type of emotion.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00787-025-02846-y.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** conduct disorder (MONDO:0005352)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** antisocial behavior (MESH:D000987), CD (MESH:D019955)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917026/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917026/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917026/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12917026