# Iron‐Based Materials for Advanced Lithium/Sodium‐Ion Batteries

**Authors:** Jianfeng Hou, Xihan Tan, Honglei Zhang, Ning Han, Lei Jiang, Dechao Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202502590 · Chemsuschem · 2026-02-18

## TL;DR

This paper reviews iron-based materials for lithium and sodium-ion batteries, focusing on improving performance through structural design and addressing challenges like volume expansion.

## Contribution

The paper systematically summarizes recent progress in iron-based anode materials and strategies to mitigate volume expansion for improved battery performance.

## Key findings

- Iron-based compounds offer high theoretical capacity and environmental benefits but face challenges like volume expansion.
- Strategies such as nanostructure design and carbon composites help mitigate structural instability during cycling.
- DFT-guided design and interface optimization are highlighted as promising approaches for future development.

## Abstract

Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) and sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) help meet the growing global demand for sustainable energy storage due to their high energy density, portability, and rechargeability. As a key component of secondary battery systems, the anode material largely determines their overall performance. However, commercial graphite is limited by its low theoretical capacity (372 mAh·g−1) and poor Na+ storage capacity, necessitating the exploration of alternative anode materials. Among the numerous candidate materials, iron‐based compounds (including oxides, sulfides, and porous materials derived from metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)) stand out due to their high theoretical specific capacity, natural abundance, and environmental friendliness. However, severe volume expansion and structural instability during repeated charge–discharge cycles lead to rapid capacity decay, severely hindering their practical application. This review systematically summarizes the recent progress in iron‐based compounds as anodes for LIBs and SIBs. The electrochemical properties of iron oxides, iron sulfides, and porous iron‐based derivatives are highlighted, with particular attention paid to the challenges posed by volume expansion. Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis of the strategies developed to mitigate volume expansion, such as nanostructure design, carbon composites, hollow/porous structure engineering, and interface optimization, is presented. Finally, current limitations and future research opportunities are outlined, aiming to provide guidance for the rational design of high‐performance iron‐based anode materials for next‐generation rechargeable batteries.

This Review examines iron‐based anode materials for lithium‐ and sodium‐ion batteries, emphasizing how phase chemistry (sulfides, oxides, and metal–organic framework (MOF)‐derived compounds), multiscale structural engineering, and interface regulation collectively address volume expansion, conductivity limitations, and cycling instability, while highlighting emerging roles of density functional theory (DFT)‐guided design and thermal safety considerations for practical energy storage systems.© 2026 WILEY‐VCH GmbH

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** lithium (PubChem CID 28486), sodium (PubChem CID 5360545), graphite (PubChem CID 5462310)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** TR (MESH:D020886), SIBs (MESH:C562576)
- **Chemicals:** porphyrin (MESH:D011166), graphene (MESH:D006108), Fe7S8 (-), MoS2 (MESH:C082964), Metal (MESH:D008670), CNFs (MESH:C071110), carbonate (MESH:D002254), Sb2S3 (MESH:C064234), S (MESH:D013455), H2S (MESH:D006862), iron nitride (MESH:C000723311), Au (MESH:D006046), Prussian blue (MESH:C000170), Polysulfides (MESH:C032915), K (MESH:D011188), Na2S (MESH:C033479), sulfides (MESH:D013440), oxygen (MESH:D010100), Na (MESH:D012964), MOFs (MESH:C040750), Ni (MESH:D009532), MOF (MESH:D000073396), Ti (MESH:D014025), N (MESH:D009584), heme (MESH:D006418), CoFe2O4 (MESH:C569492), FeS2 (MESH:C011342), C (MESH:D002244), Sb (MESH:D000965), S8 (MESH:C039415), TiO2 (MESH:C009495), Co (MESH:D003035), F (MESH:D005461), Li (MESH:D008094), FeO (MESH:C034236), TCPP (MESH:C018395), Fe (MESH:D007501), persulfides (MESH:C051552), Fe2O3 (MESH:C000499), Fe2S3 (MESH:C022597), polydopamine (MESH:C568283), dopamine (MESH:D004298), MXene (MESH:C000723374), DABCO (MESH:C007306), Mn (MESH:D008345), FOC (MESH:C052499), oxide (MESH:D010087)
- **Cell lines:** FM/P-2 — Homo sapiens (Human), Cutaneous melanoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_UI32)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916231/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916231/full.md

## References

83 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916231/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916231