# Current gynaecological management of women and girls with bleeding disorders in the United Kingdom: A UKHCDO haemophilia treatment centre survey and evaluation of real‐world clinical practice for the British Journal of Haematology

**Authors:** Laura Knox, Imogen Swart‐Rimmer, Naim Rahimi, Callum Harris, Lugain Abdalla, Gary Benson, Clare Brown, Helen Campbell, Ana Carvalhosa, Justin T. Clarke, Sarah Garside, Claire Lentaigne, Jayna Mistry, Priyanka Raheja, Cora Warren, Rezan Abdul‐Kadir, Gill Lowe, Nicola Curry

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70295 · British Journal of Haematology · 2025-12-19

## TL;DR

This study examines gynaecological care for women and girls with bleeding disorders in the UK, highlighting gaps and suggesting improvements for better health outcomes.

## Contribution

The study provides a national evaluation of gynaecological care for GWBD and identifies actionable recommendations for improving their treatment.

## Key findings

- Immediate clinical care for heavy menstrual bleeding is adequate, but infrastructure like joint-gynaecology input is lacking.
- Direct access to gynaecological services and universal iron testing are recommended to improve care equity.
- The study emphasizes the need to address the psycho-social and quality-of-life impacts of heavy menstrual bleeding.

## Abstract

Girls and women with bleeding disorders (GWBD) comprise more than half of all registered patients with bleeding disorders in the UK National Haemophilia Database. The gynaecological care of GWBD, until recently, has not been prioritised despite high health burdens, where four of every five patients experience heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). We report the results of a national survey exploring gynaecological health‐care services offered across haemophilia centres in the United Kingdom, with a focus on HMB. We combine these results with a retrospective cohort analysis of individual patient care records, across a 3‐year period. Of 65 haemophilia centres, 41 responded, covering 90% of the UK GWBD population. Six hundred and ninety‐seven individual patient care records were included, from 13 centres. Our results show that immediate clinical care offered to GWBD experiencing HMB is adequate, despite infrastructure deficiencies (such as lack of joint‐gynaecology input and few centres having named clinical leads for GWBD). We recommend several areas for immediate prioritisation within haemophilia centres which will improve the equity of care for GWBD. These include direct access to gynaecological services; universal testing of iron status; and more broadly, a shift towards clinical practices that recognise and address the impact HMB has on patients' psycho‐social, sexual and overall quality of life.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** HMB (MESH:D008595), bleeding disorders (MESH:D006470), GWBD (MESH:C536013), Haemophilia (MESH:D006467)
- **Chemicals:** iron (MESH:D007501)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916183/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916183/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916183/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12916183