Erratum for Fecteau et al., “Primary production by the purple nonsulfur bacterium Rhodopila globiformis in an acidic, moderately sulfidic warm spring”
Kristopher M. Fecteau, Katelyn M. Weeks, R. Vincent Debes, Tanner J. Barnes, Kirtland J. Robinson, Joshua J. Nye, Melody R. Lindsay, Eric S. Boyd, Everett L. Shock
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology · Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
ERRATUM
Volume 91, no. 10, e01217-25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01217-25.
Page 6, line 45: “vegan package (v2.6-4; 71)” should read “vegan package (v.2.6-4 [71]).”
Page 8, line 41: “isotopic discrimination factor (1.05; 75)” should read “isotopic discrimination factor (1.05 [75]).”
Page 10, line 8: “under acidic conditions (~56°C; 77)” should read “under acidic conditions (~56°C [77]).”
Page 18, line 37: “As purple nonsulfur bacteria are thought to favor and excel at photoheterotrophic growth, they were originally isolated and have been exclusively grown in the lab with organic substrates.” should read “As purple nonsulfur bacteria are thought to favor and excel at photoheterotrophic growth, R. globiformis was originally isolated and has been exclusively grown in the lab with organic substrates.”