# Modifying inhibitor specificity for homologous enzymes by machine learning

**Authors:** Dor S. Gozlan, Reut Meiri, Gili Shapira, Matt Coban, Evette S. Radisky, Yaron Orenstein, Niv Papo

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/febs.70249 · The Febs Journal · 2025-09-05

## TL;DR

A machine learning method was developed to design selective enzyme inhibitors, reducing the need for extensive experiments and enabling the creation of more targeted therapeutics.

## Contribution

The novel ML-based method successfully designed a selective protease inhibitor variant with experimentally validated enhanced specificity.

## Key findings

- A novel N-TIMP2 variant was designed with high specificity for MMP-9 and low affinity for MMP-1.
- Structural insights were obtained through molecular modeling and energy minimization.
- The ML method reduced experimental workload and enabled rational inhibitor design.

## Abstract

Selective inhibitors are essential for targeted therapeutics and for probing enzyme functions in various biological systems. The two main challenges in identifying such protein‐based inhibitors lie in the extensive experimental effort required, including the generation of large libraries, and in tailoring the selectivity of inhibitors to enzymes with homologous structures. To address these challenges, machine learning (ML) is being used to improve protein design by training on targeted libraries and identifying key interface mutations that enhance affinity and specificity. However, such ML‐based methods are limited by inaccurate energy calculations and difficulties in predicting the structural impacts of multiple mutations. Here, we present an ML‐based method that leverages HTS data to streamline the design of selective protease inhibitors. To demonstrate its utility, we applied our new method to find inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of homologous proteases involved in both physiological and pathological processes. By training ML models on binding data for three MMPs (MMP‐1, MMP‐3, and MMP‐9), we successfully designed a novel N‐TIMP2 variant with a differential specificity profile, namely, high affinity for MMP‐9, moderate affinity for MMP‐3, and low affinity for MMP‐1. Our experimental validation showed that this novel variant exhibited a significant specificity shift and enhanced selectivity compared with wild‐type N‐TIMP2. Through molecular modeling and energy minimization, we obtained structural insights into the variant's enhanced selectivity. Our findings highlight the power of ML‐based methods to reduce experimental workloads, facilitate the rational design of selective inhibitors, and advance the understanding of specific inhibitor–enzyme interactions in homologous enzyme systems.

We present a machine learning method for the design of selective enzyme inhibitors, reducing experimental effort thus accelerating the development of targeted therapeutics. Trained on existing data for three related matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), our method successfully designed a novel inhibitor variant with enhanced selectivity for one MMP over the others. Using computer simulations, we gained a structural understanding of how the new inhibitor works and why it is more selective.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** MMP1 (matrix metallopeptidase 1), MMP3 (matrix metallopeptidase 3), MMP9 (matrix metallopeptidase 9)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** MMP9 (matrix metallopeptidase 9) [NCBI Gene 4318] {aka CLG4B, GELB, MANDP2, MMP-9}, TIMP2 (TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 2) [NCBI Gene 7077] {aka CSC-21K, DDC8}, MMP1 (matrix metallopeptidase 1) [NCBI Gene 4312] {aka CLG}, MMP3 (matrix metallopeptidase 3) [NCBI Gene 4314] {aka CHDS6, MMP-3, SL-1, STMY, STMY1, STR1}

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914771/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914771/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914771/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914771