# Phytochemical and Antioxidant Profiling of Traditional Fruit Vinegars: A Comparative Study of Fruit Species

**Authors:** Ayşen Melda Çolak, Fatma Alan, İbrahim Bulduk, Civan Çelik

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.71481 · Food Science & Nutrition · 2026-02-17

## TL;DR

This study compares the health benefits of vinegars made from three fruits, finding that blackberry and gilaburu vinegars have higher phytochemical content, while bitter orange vinegar has strong antioxidant properties.

## Contribution

The study provides a comparative analysis of phytochemical and antioxidant profiles of traditional fruit vinegars from three different species.

## Key findings

- Blackberry and gilaburu vinegars had the highest total phenolic content.
- Bitter orange vinegar showed high antioxidant activity despite lower phenolic content.
- Principal component analysis revealed phytochemical differences driven by fruit species genetics.

## Abstract

In this study, natural fruit vinegars produced from gilaburu (
Viburnum opulus
), blackberry (
Rubus fruticosus
), and bitter orange (
Citrus aurantium
) using traditional fermentation methods were compared in terms of their phytochemical composition and antioxidant capacity. Total phenolic content (496.07–696.0 mg GAE·L−1), flavonoid levels (376.10–960.97 mg QE·L−1), antioxidant activity (DPPH assay, 82.97%–92.02%), and organic acid profiles particularly oxalic acid (105.00–109.33 mg·L−1) and acetic acid (288.00–308.67 mg·L−1) were analyzed. The results revealed statistically significant differences among vinegar types in terms of total phenolic compounds, flavonoid levels, and certain organic acids (p < 0.001). Blackberry and gilaburu vinegars exhibited the highest total phenolic content, whereas the highest flavonoid level was determined in blackberry vinegar. The lowest flavonoid levels were observed in bitter orange vinegar, whereas bitter orange vinegar was distinguished by its acetic acid content within the organic acid profile. Despite having relatively lower phenolic and flavonoid contents, bitter orange vinegar demonstrated a high antioxidant activity comparable to that of the other vinegars (p > 0.05). This finding is likely attributable to synergistic effects between organic acids and other bioactive compounds. Phytochemical variation and sample grouping were visualized using principal component analysis, indicating that the observed differences were largely driven by the genetic characteristics of the fruit species because of the study design, ecological effects could not be evaluated independently of genetic factors. Overall, the findings suggest that blackberry and gilaburu vinegars possess a higher potential as functional food products, whereas bitter orange vinegar represents a valuable alternative owing to its strong antioxidant capacity and distinctive organic acid profile.

The graphical abstract illustrates the phytochemical composition and antioxidant capacity of gilaburu (Viburnum opulus), blackberry (Rubus fruticosus), and bitter orange (Citrus aurantium) vinegars, highlighting species‐specific differences in functional properties.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** oxalic acid (PubChem CID 971), acetic acid (PubChem CID 176)
- **Species:** Viburnum opulus (taxon 85293), Rubus fruticosus (taxon 211815)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** PCSK1 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1) [NCBI Gene 5122] {aka BMIQ12, NEC1, PC1, PC1/3, PC3, SPC3}, LYST (lysosomal trafficking regulator) [NCBI Gene 1130] {aka CHS, CHS1, Mauve}, SHCBP1 (SHC binding and spindle associated 1) [NCBI Gene 79801] {aka PAL}
- **Diseases:** TFC (MESH:D063466), TPC (MESH:C537895), cancer (MESH:D009369), diabetes (MESH:D003920), cardiovascular disorders (MESH:D002318)
- **Chemicals:** AlCl3 (MESH:D000077410), CitA (MESH:D019343), water (MESH:D014867), sodium carbonate (MESH:C005686), phenolic acid (MESH:C017616), anthocyanin (MESH:D000872), ascorbic acid (MESH:D001205), AceA (MESH:D019342), drinking water (MESH:D060766), sodium acetate (MESH:D019346), Flavonoid (MESH:D005419), ethanol (MESH:D000431), flavonol (MESH:C041477), OxaA (MESH:D019815), methanol (MESH:D000432), flavanone (MESH:C028610), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (-), Gallic acid (MESH:D005707), proanthocyanidin (MESH:C013221), oxygen (MESH:D010100), sugar (MESH:D000073893), QE (MESH:D011794), amino acids (MESH:D000596), chlorine (MESH:D002713), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (MESH:C004931), TarA (MESH:C029768)
- **Species:** Acetobacter subgen. Acetobacter (subgenus) [taxon 151157], Rubus fruticosus (species) [taxon 211815], Rubus idaeus (European red raspberry, species) [taxon 32247], Viburnum opulus (crampbark, species) [taxon 85293], Citrus x aurantium (bitter orange, species) [taxon 43166], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932]
- **Mutations:** C-25 C

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914146/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914146/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914146/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12914146