# Predicting individual differences in digital alcohol intervention effectiveness through multimodal data

**Authors:** Magdalena Fuchs, Zachary M. Boyd, Alice Schwarze, Danielle Cosme, Ovidia Stanoi, Yoona Kang, Tobias Kowatsch, Florian von Wangenheim, Dani S. Bassett, Kevin N. Ochsner, David M. Lydon-Staley, Emily B. Falk, Peter J. Mucha, Mia Jovanova

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41746-026-02356-4 · NPJ Digital Medicine · 2026-01-27

## TL;DR

This paper shows how combining different types of data can help predict who will benefit most from digital alcohol interventions for young adults.

## Contribution

A novel multimodal approach integrating psychological, social, and neural data to predict individual intervention effectiveness.

## Key findings

- Random forest models predicted intervention effectiveness with balanced accuracy of 0.71 and AUC of 0.87 in Study 1.
- Results replicated in an external sample with balanced accuracy of 0.68 and AUC of 0.68 in Study 2.
- Peer drinking perceptions were a key indicator for identifying non-responders in alcohol interventions.

## Abstract

Digital interventions can change behaviors like alcohol use, but effectiveness varies widely across individuals. Accurately identifying non-responders—i.e., those least (vs. most) likely to change their behavior—before intervention delivery is difficult. Individual intervention effectiveness predictions from prior studies perform only slightly above chance (e.g., AUC ≈0.60; balanced accuracy ≈0.60). We present a novel approach integrating multimodal data across theory-driven domains—including psychological assessments, social network data, and neural responses to alcohol cues—to make ex-ante predictions about the effectiveness of smartphone-delivered alcohol interventions targeting psychological distancing in young adults (Study 1: N = 67; Study 2: N = 114). Demonstrating the feasibility of this approach, random forest models predicted individual differences in intervention effectiveness (Study 1: balanced accuracy = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.69–0.73, p = .020; AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.85–0.88, p = .020) and replicated in a an external test sample (Study 2, balanced accuracy = 0.68; AUC = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54–0.82), meeting clinical-utility thresholds from prior digital health studies (balanced accuracy = 0.67; correctly classifying (non)responders 67% of the time). Interventions were most effective for participants who perceived their peers as moderate but frequent drinkers. Peer drinking perceptions may serve as a low-burden indicator to support early identification of non-responders in preventive alcohol interventions among young adults. Future work can apply and extend the multimodal approach developed here for adaptive tailoring of digital behavior change interventions in real-world settings.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913919/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913919/full.md

## References

14 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913919/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913919