# Comparative chloroplast genomics of Cypripedioideae: structural divergence, adaptive evolution, and phylogenomic insights

**Authors:** Xiaoyan Zhao, Xiaoxiao Lan, Zishuo Wang, Dong Li, Wei Sun, Yunpeng Gai, Bing Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1723281 · Frontiers in Plant Science · 2026-02-04

## TL;DR

This study explores how chloroplast genomes in slipper orchids evolved with natural selection shaping codon usage and structural changes linked to ecological adaptations.

## Contribution

The study provides the most comprehensive analysis of codon usage bias and structural evolution in Cypripedioideae chloroplast genomes.

## Key findings

- Natural selection, not mutational pressure, primarily drives codon usage bias in Cypripedioideae chloroplast genomes.
- Lineage-specific structural variations in chloroplast genomes correlate with ecological adaptations in slipper orchids.
- Purifying selection dominates in photosystem and ribosomal protein genes across Cypripedioideae.

## Abstract

The Cypripedioideae subfamily (slipper orchids) exhibits remarkable ecological diversity, spanning temperate to tropical habitats, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying its adaptive radiation remain poorly understood. Chloroplast genomes, with their critical roles in photosynthesis and conserved structure, offer a powerful system to investigate how evolutionary forces shape genomic adaptation. This study presents the most comprehensive analysis to date of codon usage bias (CUB) and structural evolution in Cypripedioideae chloroplast genomes, evaluating the relative contributions of mutational pressure and natural selection across ecologically divergent lineages. We assembled and annotated the complete chloroplast genome of Paphiopedilum armeniacum and integrated it with 47 publicly available genomes, representing all four genera of Cypripedioideae. Comparative analyses included genome structure relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), effective number of codons (ENC) vs. GC3s plots, neutrality analysis, parity rule 2 (PR2) bias analysis, simple sequence repeat (SSR) profiling, and selection pressure assessment (Ka/Ks). Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using maximum likelihood based on 81 concatenated protein-coding genes. Cypripedioideae chloroplast genomes displayed substantial size variation (147–230 kb) and lineage-specific structural features, including inverted repeat (IR) expansion and small single-copy (SSC) contraction in Paphiopedilum. Codon usage was strongly biased toward A/U-ending codons, with minimal influence from mutational pressure. ENC-GC3s plots, neutrality analysis (regression slopes = 0.003–0.324), and PR2 plots consistently indicated that natural selection accounted for >90% of CUB variation across most species. Ka/Ks analysis revealed predominant purifying selection (94.7% of genes with Ka/Ks < 1), with photosystem and ribosomal protein genes under the strongest constraints. Phylogenomic analysis resolved genus-level relationships and showed correlations between genome architecture, codon usage patterns, and ecological distributions. Our findings demonstrate that natural selection, rather than mutational pressure, is the primary driver of codon usage optimization in Cypripedioideae chloroplast genomes. Lineage-specific structural variations—including IR/SSC boundary dynamics, genome size expansion, and ndh gene loss—are closely associated with ecological adaptations to temperate, subtropical, and tropical environments. This study provides novel insights into the interplay between selection-driven codon usage, plastome structural evolution, and ecological diversification, offering a genomic framework for understanding adaptive evolution in orchids and other plant lineages.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** GLIS3 (GLIS family zinc finger 3) [NCBI Gene 169792]
- **Species:** Paphiopedilum armeniacum (taxon 53069)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** clpP [NCBI Gene 19737511], psaB [NCBI Gene 19737477], atpI [NCBI Gene 19737458], rbcL [NCBI Gene 19737492], ndhD [NCBI Gene 24148284], psaC [NCBI Gene 24019532], ndhE [NCBI Gene 19737551], ndhH [NCBI Gene 19737555], ycf1 [NCBI Gene 19737557], rpl22 [NCBI Gene 24019587], ndhI [NCBI Gene 19737553], ndhB [NCBI Gene 19737568], ndhF [NCBI Gene 19737545], infA [NCBI Gene 19737521], ndhK [NCBI Gene 19737486], psaA [NCBI Gene 19737478], ndhG [NCBI Gene 19737552], ndhA [NCBI Gene 19737554], psbA [NCBI Gene 19737445], rpl20 [NCBI Gene 19737509], ndhJ [NCBI Gene 19737485], matK [NCBI Gene 19737447], ycf1 [NCBI Gene 24019596], rpoC1 [NCBI Gene 19737461], atpB [NCBI Gene 19737491], atpA [NCBI Gene 19737455], atpF [NCBI Gene 19737456], atpE [NCBI Gene 19737490], ccsA [NCBI Gene 24019624]
- **Chemicals:** dinucleotide (MESH:D015226), agarose (MESH:D012685), AGA (MESH:C022324), CGU (-), CGA (MESH:C554042), silica (MESH:D012822), CTAB (MESH:D000077286), arginine (MESH:D001120), cytosine (MESH:D003596), leucine (MESH:D007930), AT (MESH:D001246), adenine (MESH:D000225), thymine (MESH:D013941), C (MESH:D002244), guanine (MESH:D006147)
- **Species:** Cryobacterium flavum (species) [taxon 1424659], Paphiopedilum charlesworthii (species) [taxon 53076], Cypripedium (genus) [taxon 38190], Pinus subgen. Pinus (diploxylon pines, subgenus) [taxon 139271], Phragmipedium lindenii (species) [taxon 53132], Cypripedium calceolus (species) [taxon 53038], Paphiopedilum armeniacum (species) [taxon 53069], Mexipedium xerophyticum (species) [taxon 53063], Cypripedium subtropicum (species) [taxon 1088836], Paphiopedilum delenatii (species) [taxon 78826], C. japonicum [taxon 231009], Paphiopedilum tranlienianum (species) [taxon 451014], Cinnamomum micranthum (species) [taxon 337465], Cypripedium formosanum (species) [taxon 53042], Cypripedium macranthos (species) [taxon 53046], P. malipoense [taxon 53101], Paphiopedilum dianthum (species) [taxon 53081], Rasamsonia emersonii (species) [taxon 68825]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913576/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913576/full.md

## References

78 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913576/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913576