# The effects of transitional care intervention on health outcomes in burn patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Xiangling Sun, Zhaohong Ding, Kang Yi, Li Zhang, Shuyun Hao, Manli Wu, Lingling Li

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2026.1743848 · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · 2026-02-04

## TL;DR

This study shows that transitional care improves quality of life and mental health in burn patients after discharge.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence that transitional care interventions significantly enhance health outcomes in burn patients.

## Key findings

- Transitional care improved quality of life in burn patients with a mean difference of 26.82.
- Mental health scores improved significantly with transitional care, showing a mean difference of -16.57.

## Abstract

Burn patients often face challenges such as discontinuity of care, high risk of complications, and psychological adaptation difficulties after discharge. Transitional care is a critical measure to ensure their safe transition across different healthcare settings. This study employs a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the impact of transitional care interventions on health outcomes in burn patients, providing evidence to support improved continuity of care.

EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science were searched from the establishment of the databases to July 2025. All analysis were conducted using the Revman 5.3.

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis, encompassing 281 burn patients, with 141 receiving transitional care interventions and 140 receiving usual care. The meta-analysis revealed that transitional care could significantly enhance the quality of life among burned patients [MD = 26.82, 95% CI (4.25, 49.39), p = 0.02], and mental health [MD = −16.57, 95% CI (−25.36, −7.78), p < 0.001].

Transitional care has been shown to effectively improve patients’ quality of life and improve emotional well-being. Future studies should integrate both subjective reporting and objective assessment metrics to further validate the independent effects and synergistic interactions of distinct intervention modules within transitional care frameworks.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ PROSPERO CRD420251042795.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** burn (MONDO:0043519)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** scars (MESH:D002921), stroke (MESH:D020521), post-traumatic stress disorder (MESH:D013313), Itch (MESH:D011537), hand injuries (MESH:D006230), scar contractures (MESH:D003286), Burn (MESH:D002056), disease (MESH:D004194), trauma (MESH:D014947), Pain (MESH:D010146), insomnia (MESH:D007319), thermal injury (MESH:D020886), anxiety (MESH:D001007), social anxiety (MESH:D000072861), depression (MESH:D003866), heart failure (MESH:D006333), deep partial (MESH:D057887), chronic diseases (MESH:D002908), joint deformities (MESH:D016916), loss of function (MESH:D006315)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913459/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913459/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913459/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12913459