Correction: Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOvarian function and disorders · Gynecological conditions and treatments · Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Preesman E, Drechsel K, Crommelin H*, et al*. Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ Open 2025;**15:**e111872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111872.
This article has been updated since it was first published. The study design in the title was incorrectly described as “a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial”.