# Investigating health-related barriers to green space use, chronic health conditions and sociodemographic characteristics: a structural equation modelling approach

**Authors:** Hannah Burnett, Jonathan R Olsen, Sarah E Rodgers, Richard Mitchell

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-003077 · BMJ Public Health · 2026-02-11

## TL;DR

This study explores how chronic health conditions and sociodemographic factors influence barriers to using green spaces, finding that people with disabilities or progressive illnesses face more challenges.

## Contribution

The study introduces a structural equation modeling approach to analyze health-related barriers to green space use by chronic health conditions and sociodemographics.

## Key findings

- Respondents with physical disabilities or progressive illnesses reported more health-related barriers to green space use.
- Lack of disabled facilities and lack of social support were significant barriers for those with progressive illnesses.
- Place-based and physical health-related factors both hinder green space use for individuals with chronic conditions.

## Abstract

Using green space improves health and well-being. However, there are many barriers to green space use, including poor health. Evidence is lacking on how health-related barriers to green space differ by chronic health condition. This study investigates health-related barriers to green space use, chronic health conditions and sociodemographic characteristics.

We assessed health-related barriers to green space use using Natural England’s People and Nature Survey. Data from 5 months of the nationally representative survey of English adults (aged 16+) were used (n=10 415), collected during November 2020–March 2021. To assess relationships between reporting of health-related barriers to using green space, an individual’s chronic health conditions and sociodemographic characteristics, structural equation modelling was used (n=201).

Respondents with progressive illnesses or physical disabilities had a higher likelihood of reporting multiple (four) health-related barriers as important compared with respondents with arthritis or diabetes (both had no barriers that they were more likely to report). For example, respondents with physical disabilities (32%) and progressive illnesses (31%) had an increased likelihood of reporting lack of disabled facilities as an important barrier to using green space compared with those with other conditions. Those with progressive illnesses (34%) had a particularly higher likelihood of reporting having no one to go with/help as an important barrier to using green space (p=0.001). Both physical health-related (eg, fatigue) and place-based (eg, poorly maintained sites) factors are barriers to green space use for individuals reporting a chronic condition.

The results suggest that those with physical disabilities and progressive illnesses would benefit most from reducing place-based and support barriers, such as a lack of disabled facilities and no one to go with/help. By improving the suitability of green spaces using this evidence, barriers to green space would be reduced for all users, which may improve the quality of the space.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** arthritis (MONDO:0005578), diabetes (MONDO:0005015)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** physical (MESH:D059445), hypertension (MESH:D006973), Parkinson's disease (MESH:D010300), Arthritis (MESH:D001168), condition (MESH:D020763), Respiratory or breathing problems (MESH:D012818), asthma (MESH:D001249), Cancer (MESH:D009369), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), Diabetes (MESH:D003920), progressive illnesses (MESH:D018450), fatigue (MESH:D005221), heart-related (MESH:D006331), Dementia (MESH:D003704), respiratory (MESH:D012131), disability (MESH:D009069), ill (MESH:D002908), chronic health (MESH:D000071069)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12911733/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12911733/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12911733/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12911733