# Dosimetric impact of port number in TomoDirect‐based lower‐body total body irradiation

## TL;DR

This study compares the dosimetric effects of different port numbers in TomoDirect lower-body irradiation and finds that two ports offer the best performance.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the dosimetric impact of port numbers in TomoDirect TBI and identifies optimal configurations for clinical use.

## Key findings

- Two-port TomoDirect plans showed the best dose indices and shortest beam-on time.
- Dose homogeneity improved in TomoDirect compared to TomoHelical, except for five-port configurations.
- D98 was lower in TomoDirect plans with three and five ports compared to TomoHelical.

## Abstract

The feasibility of total body irradiation (TBI) delivery using the TomoDirect mode of a TomoTherapy system has been demonstrated. In clinical practice, TomoTherapy‐based TBI is typically performed in two parts: upper and lower body.

This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact of varying port numbers on dose evaluation indices for lower body irradiation using TomoDirect and to compare these results with those of TomoHelical in a simulation setting.

Sixteen patients who underwent myeloablative TBI using TomoHelical between October 2017 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. TomoDirect plans with 2 to 12 ports at approximately equal beam angles were generated (modulation factor = 1.5, field width = 5.0 cm, pitch = 0.500). TomoHelical plans used identical parameters except for a pitch of 0.397. The prescribed dose was 12 Gy in six fractions. Dose indices (D2, D98, D50, homogeneity index [HI]) and beam‐on time were compared.

In TomoDirect plans, all dose evaluation indices worsened as the number of ports increased up to five, but changes became minimal beyond eight ports. D2 was significantly improved in all TomoDirect plans compared with those of TomoHelical plan. D98 was significantly lower for the three‐ and five‐port TomoDirect plans, and no TomoDirect plan achieved higher D98 than TomoHelical. The D50 and HI were significantly improved in all TomoDirect plans except the five‐port configuration. The two‐port TomoDirect plan achieved the most favorable dose indices and the shortest beam‐on time.

The two‐port TomoDirect approach with anterior‐posterior beam configuration provides an efficient and clinically reasonable option for lower‐body irradiation, offering improved dose homogeneity and reduced treatment time compared with TomoHelical.