Phase equilibria modelling of trace element evolution in arc magmas: implications for petrogenesis and copper porphyry indicators
Caroline R. Soderman, Owen M. Weller

TL;DR
This paper models how trace elements in volcanic magmas evolve, showing that traditional assumptions about their origins may be misleading.
Contribution
The study introduces a dynamic thermodynamic model to track trace element evolution in arc magmas, revealing new insights into petrogenesis and porphyry indicators.
Findings
Amphibole and garnet can produce overlapping trace element patterns under deep, hydrous conditions.
High Sr/Y ratios in magmas can form without deep, hydrous, or oxidized conditions when dynamic partitioning is considered.
Multiple petrogenetic paths can lead to similar whole-rock trace element signatures, especially with uncertain primitive melt compositions.
Abstract
Trace element ratios in arc magmas are widely used to infer petrogenetic conditions, particularly those associated with porphyry-forming versus barren systems. However, quantitatively linking whole-rock signatures to pressure, water content, or redox conditions remains challenging, as trace elements are sensitive to mineral assemblage and compositions, which both evolve during fractional crystallisation. Here, we integrate a recently updated thermodynamic model suite appropriate for arc systems with dynamic (composition-, temperature-dependent) mineral-melt partitioning to track trace element evolution. Benchmarking the model against published experiments, including apatite saturation, shows that the methodology successfully reproduces phase assemblages and compositions. We simulate fractional crystallisation of an average primitive arc magma across mid- to lower-crustal pressures (4–10…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeological and Geochemical Analysis · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
