A novel projection data domain material decomposition method for dual-energy CT and its impact on the accuracy of attenuation values
Viktor Haase, Frédéric Noo, Karl Stierstorfer, Andreas Maier, Michael McNitt-Gray

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method for improving the accuracy of CT scans by decomposing materials in the projection data domain, reducing artifacts and errors in attenuation values.
Contribution
A novel projection data domain material decomposition method with object-specific scatter correction is proposed for dual-energy CT.
Findings
The method significantly improves attenuation value accuracy, especially at low energies (<70 keV).
It reduces beam hardening artifacts and provides more uniform quantitative error across non-water inserts.
Object-specific scatter correction prevents major artifacts and performs well in abdominal phantom imaging.
Abstract
Objective. Despite major advances in dual-energy computed tomography (CT), obtaining accurate attenuation values for quantitative applications remains a technical challenge. To address this topic, we introduce a novel projection data domain material decomposition method that is an extension of an approach we recently proposed for beam hardening correction in single energy CT. Approach. The proposed method employs object-specific scatter correction and an analytical energy response model. We compare its performance to image-based material decomposition on accuracy of attenuation values using the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom, scanned with consecutive low and high energy axial scans in centered and off-centered positions. Accuracy is assessed across the five inserts, and the images are analyzed for beam hardening artifacts and noise. Additionally, we assess…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Radiation Dose and Imaging
