# Effect of Different Airborne‐Particle Abrasion Strategies on Dentin Bond Strength: An In Vitro Study

**Authors:** Rui I. Falacho, Gabriela Almeida, Romina Ñaupari‐Villasante, Joana A. Marques, Francisco Caramelo, Markus B. Blatz, Alessandro Loguercio, João Carlos Ramos

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/jerd.70053 · 2025-11-26

## TL;DR

This study compares how different methods of airborne-particle abrasion affect the bond strength of dental adhesives on dentin.

## Contribution

The study introduces a comparison of bioactive glass and aluminum oxide abrasion with and without irrigation for dentin bonding.

## Key findings

- Aluminum oxide with irrigation significantly increased bond strength compared to the control.
- Bond strength without irrigation depends on the adhesive strategy used.
- Bioactive glass did not significantly affect bonding performance.

## Abstract

To assess the influence of dentin airborne‐particle abrasion techniques on the microtensile bond strength, using two adhesive strategies (self‐etch and etch&rinse).

Twenty molars were assigned to two groups (n = 10) according to the bonding system (Clearfil SE Bond or Optibond FL), divided into four parts and submitted to different surface treatments: no pretreatment (control), airborne‐particle abrasion with aluminum oxide without irrigation (Al2O3), airborne‐particle abrasion with aluminum oxide with irrigation (Al2O3/Aquasol), and airborne‐particle abrasion with bioactive glass 45S5 (BG45S5). Specimens underwent microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Statistical analysis employed a linear mixed regression model, with a 5% significance level.

Statistically significant differences were found for both adhesive strategy (p < 0.001) and pretreatment (p < 0.001). Al2O3/Aquasol and Al2O3 exhibit statistically significant differences compared to the control (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively), while BG45S5 did not differ significantly (p = 0.080). SEM images reveal a smear layer with distinct density across groups, and diminished compactation whenever irrigation was used.

Aluminum oxide with simultaneous irrigation resulted in the highest bond strength values, while without irrigation bond strength outcomes depend on the adhesive strategy. Bioactive glass did not interfere with bonding performance.

Aluminum oxide airborne‐particle abrasion with concomitant irrigation presents the preferable surface pretreatment strategy when bonding to sound dentin.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** aluminum oxide (PubChem CID 9989226)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Al2O3 (MESH:D000537), Aquasol (MESH:D014801), Clearfil SE Bond (MESH:C438313), Optibond FL (MESH:C469607)

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12906857/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12906857