# Ultra-Fast-Track Extubation Within Four Hours Versus Conventional Ventilation After Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review of Intensive Care Unit Stay and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Outcomes

**Authors:** Muhammad Farhan, Tirath Patel, Dania Almarouj, Vindhesh Dixit, Mohammed Abdullah, Lamia Bnaian, Reem Imadeldin Ahmed Hamad, Elwy Josey, Aiswariya Anna Alexander, Ashfaq Ahmad, Adekunle E Omole

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.101621 · 2026-01-15

## TL;DR

Ultra-fast-track extubation after robotic heart surgery reduces ICU and hospital stays without increasing complications.

## Contribution

This systematic review compares ultra-fast-track extubation to conventional ventilation after robotic coronary surgery.

## Key findings

- UFTE reduced ICU length of stay by nearly half compared to conventional ventilation.
- Hospital stays were 1-4 days shorter with UFTE and no increase in adverse outcomes.
- Postoperative atrial fibrillation rates were similar or lower with UFTE.

## Abstract

Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-CABG) is a minimally invasive procedure that can lead to quicker recovery. Ultra-fast-track extubation (UFTE) within four hours post-surgery is a key element of enhanced recovery. This review compared UFTE versus conventional ventilation (>4 hours) on intensive care unit (ICU) stay and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in adults undergoing RA-CABG.

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and others) were searched until July 2025. Inclusion criteria targeted adults undergoing RA-CABG, with outcomes assessed by ICU length of stay (LOS) and POAF incidence. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies.

Nine studies (one RCT and eight retrospective cohorts; total n=3,223) were included. UFTE reduced ICU LOS (e.g., median 21 vs. 45 hours; p=0.001) and hospital LOS (1-4 days shorter). POAF rates were similar or lower with UFTE (e.g., 3.2% vs. 14%; p=0.004). No increases in mortality, re-intubation, or other complications occurred.

UFTE after RA-CABG safely shortened ICU and hospital stays without elevating POAF or adverse outcomes. These findings support the use of UFTE in enhanced recovery protocols for carefully selected patients. However, the observational nature of most evidence highlights the need for more high-quality RCTs to confirm benefits.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** coronary artery disease (MONDO:0005010)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** POAF (MESH:D001281)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12906352/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12906352