Online Patient Education Materials for Pediatric Septic Arthritis Exceed Recommended Reading Levels: A Readability Analysis
Nicholas J Pettinelli, Madison C Blackwell, Mark Schwartz

TL;DR
This study finds that online patient education materials about pediatric septic arthritis are too hard to read, often exceeding the recommended sixth-grade level.
Contribution
The study evaluates readability of PEMs on pediatric septic arthritis from top US hospitals and identifies a significant gap in accessibility.
Findings
The mean readability level of PEMs was grade 10.6, exceeding the recommended sixth-grade level.
Only 41.7% of PEMs were at or below the eighth-grade reading level, mostly from identical third-party content.
Higher-ranked hospitals did not significantly correlate with better readability scores.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric septic arthritis is a time-sensitive orthopedic emergency requiring prompt recognition and treatment to avoid serious morbidity. Families often seek information online, yet prior studies show patient education materials (PEMs) in orthopedics frequently exceed recommended readability standards (≤6th-grade level). Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the readability of online PEMs on pediatric septic arthritis from top-ranked US pediatric orthopedic hospitals and assess alignment with readability guidelines. Methods: In July 2025, websites of the top 25 US pediatric orthopedic hospitals were searched for PEMs on “septic arthritis” in children. Hospitals were included if they hosted a dedicated PEM ≥100 words. Text was extracted, cleaned of non-narrative elements, and analyzed with eight readability metrics: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility · Social Media in Health Education · Health Education and Validation
