Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an LGBTQ+ inclusive communication skills training for multidisciplinary oncology healthcare providers
William E. Rosa, Smita C. Banerjee, Meghan McDarby, Amanda Kastrinos, Elizabeth Schofield, Kimberly D. Acquaviva, Koshy Alexander, Patricia A. Parker

TL;DR
This study tested an LGBTQ+ communication training for healthcare providers, showing it is feasible and improves knowledge and confidence in caring for LGBTQ+ cancer patients.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel experiential training program to address communication gaps in oncology care for LGBTQ+ patients and their families.
Findings
The training was feasible to deliver with an 82% participation rate and high evaluation scores.
Participants showed significant improvement in self-efficacy and LGBTQ+ healthcare knowledge after the training.
The training was well accepted, with 80% agreement or strong agreement on 13 of 15 evaluation items.
Abstract
To test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an LGBTQ+ inclusive communication skills training program. Two modules focused on basic LGBTQ+ sensitivity and communication with LGBTQ+ patients' families were delivered for multidisciplinary oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs) during two training sessions. Feasibility was determined through recruitment rate and adherence. Acceptability was evaluated based on course evaluations. Pre−/post-training assessments included LGBTQ+ healthcare knowledge, beliefs towards LGBTQ+ people, and self-efficacy. Participants were predominantly female (83%) and included 1 nurse, 2 chaplains, 8 nurse practitioners, and 7 physicians. Of the 22 HCPs who initially expressed interest and registered for the training, a total of 18 (82%) participated. 89% of participants completed post-training evaluations within one week. The training…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Cancer survivorship and care · Sex and Gender in Healthcare
