# Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

## TL;DR

This study finds that shared decision-making and patient decision aids for a heart procedure vary widely by hospital, not patient factors.

## Contribution

The study reveals institutional factors, not patient or operator characteristics, primarily drive variation in shared decision-making and decision aid use for pLAAO.

## Key findings

- 95,305 out of 147,296 encounters reported shared decision-making and decision aid use.
- Institutional level explained most of the variance in SDM plus DA reporting.
- Medicare patients did not have higher odds of SDM plus DA despite CMS requirements.

## Abstract

What are the key features associated with reported shared decision-making (SDM) and use of patient decision aids (DAs) for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (pLAAO) in patients with atrial fibrillation?

In this cohort study of 147 296 patients who received pLAAO, the observed variance in SDM plus DA reporting was large and was attributable primarily to the institutional level.

These findings suggest that whether a patient is reported as having been engaged in SDM and received a DA before pLAAO depends more on the institution performing the procedure than any other factor, underscoring the need for systems-level research to better support patient-centered care.

This cohort study describes the use of shared decision-making and decision aids and identifies key patient, operator, and institutional factors associated with their use among patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for atrial fibrillation.

Experts recommend a shared decision-making (SDM) process before percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (pLAAO) in patients with atrial fibrillation, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) require SDM with the use of a patient decision aid (DA) as a condition for reimbursement. However, little is known about how these guidelines and policies have influenced practice.

To describe overall trends in reported SDM and use of DAs for pLAAO and to identify key patient, operator, and institutional factors associated with their use.

This cohort study analyzed data from October 1, 2022, to June 30, 2024, from the American College of Cardiology’s National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) LAAO Registry. Participants included patients who underwent first-time pLAAO.

pLAAO implantation.

The proportion of encounters reporting SDM and DA use (SDM plus DA) overall and each month. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of reported SDM plus DA, the probability of SDM plus DA, and the variance in SDM plus DA associated with operator and institutional levels.

A total of 147 296 unique patient encounters (86 593 [58.8%] male; mean [SD] age, 76.6 [7.7] years) were included. Of 830 institutions participating in the NCDR LAAO Registry during the study period, 829 (99.9%) reported on SDM and 817 (98.4%) reported on DA use. In the unadjusted analysis, 95 305 encounters (64.7%) reported SDM plus DA had occurred. Unadjusted rates of SDM plus DA rose steadily during the study period from 62.5% in October 2022 to 75.0% in June 2024. The adjusted analysis suggests that the observed variance in SDM plus DA reporting was large and attributable primarily to the institutional level (median odds ratio, 115.64; 95% CI, 79.71-151.56). The range of estimated probability of SDM plus DA by institution was 0.1% to 76.4%, with a mean (SD) of 52.0% (28.6%). There was no statistically significant difference in odds of SDM plus DA for patients with Medicare vs those without (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.09).

In this cohort study of patients who underwent pLAAO, SDM plus DA reporting was high, but there was large variation between institutions. Patients with Medicare did not have greater odds of reported SDM plus DA, despite the CMS requirement. These findings exhibit the need for further exploration of institutional barriers and facilitators to SDM and DA use for pLAAO.