# Transition to online psychological support – Barriers, stereotypes and challenges from the perspective of service providers

## TL;DR

This study explores how psychological service providers transition to online care, highlighting challenges and changes in their attitudes and practices.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the practical and attitudinal shifts of professionals adapting to online psychological care.

## Key findings

- Most providers transitioned from cautious to regular online practitioners after gaining experience.
- Technical and stereotypical barriers decreased, but institutional and logistical challenges remain.
- Training and shared experiences can help address biases and improve online care adoption.

## Abstract

This qualitative study, which provides practical insights for the field, described the transition process of psychological service providers towards online care provision. We aimed to describe the process of professionals' adaptation to new methods of distant psychological care, including its main facilitating and complicating elements.

We used a qualitative approach, specifically evaluation design, employing reflexive thematic analyses conducted by the software ATLAS.ti. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 51 professionals, and 14 focus groups with 44 experts. We worked with 95 experienced professionals specializing in clinical psychology, psychological counseling, and counseling those affected by domestic violence. All of them have had practical exposure to delivering care online.

The results show that after first‐hand involvement, most of the providers have moved from being cautious experimenters to being regular practitioners of online remote psychological care in cases where it is appropriate. Technical difficulties and negative stereotypes receded, with many respondents striving to provide online services for their clients' benefit. However, some negative aspects persist, including the lack of timely support from key institutions.

Logistical barriers stem from poor management and insufficient political, legislative and financial support. Ethical and legal challenges require serious attention from key system players. The question of embodiment, involving new therapeutic cues and compensating for absent ones, warrants thorough follow‐up research. Bias and stereotype‐related barriers, often shaped by providers' attitudes, can be addressed through targeted training and shared professional experiences.