# AI-supported real-time news evaluation reveals effects of time constraint on misinformation discernment

**Authors:** Yury Shevchenko, Tom Buchanan, Ulf-Dietrich Reips

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-39555-8 · Scientific Reports · 2026-02-12

## TL;DR

This study shows that people are worse at spotting fake news when they're rushed, and that factors like digital literacy and political views affect their judgment.

## Contribution

A novel real-time, AI-supported news evaluation method using experience sampling in natural environments.

## Key findings

- False news was rated less accurate than true news, but this discernment dropped under time pressure.
- Higher digital literacy and political satisfaction were linked to better detection of false news.
- Familiarity increased perceived accuracy for both true and false news, supporting the illusory truth effect.

## Abstract

This study investigates how people perceive and evaluate true and false news in their natural environment using a novel experience sampling methodology with real-time news streaming. The sample consisted of 110 participants who evaluated news headlines on their smartphones throughout the day for two weeks, receiving notifications when new content was published. The study employed a custom-developed server that captured RSS feeds from major news outlets. The server used AI (the Open AI “gpt-4-0125-preview” model) to generate modified versions of news stories on the fly, including misinformation variants. Participants evaluated news live under experimentally manipulated conditions that included time constraints for reading the news. They also provided information about their environmental context and individual characteristics. The results showed that false news items were generally rated as less accurate than true news, but this discernment decreased under time constraint. Higher digital literacy and greater satisfaction with the political system were associated with rating false news as less accurate, whereas higher dogmatism was linked to higher perceived accuracy of false news. Familiarity was also related to higher accuracy ratings for both true and false news, meaning participants rated both types of news as more accurate when they felt familiar with it, consistent with the illusory truth effect. Integrating experimental AI-guided, real-time news generation and streaming offers a novel and much-needed approach to studying misinformation perception, providing externally valid insights into how real-world factors influence people’s ability to detect and respond to false information in their daily lives.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905439/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905439/full.md

## References

9 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905439/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905439