# European forestry systems mirror social-ecological diversity but closer-to-nature forest management and landscape planning are also required

**Authors:** Per Angelstam, Michael Manton, Thomas A. Nagel, Metodi Sotirov

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36659-z · Scientific Reports · 2026-01-26

## TL;DR

European forestry systems reflect social and ecological diversity, but new nature-friendly approaches are needed to meet modern forest policy goals.

## Contribution

The study identifies key mismatches between traditional forestry practices and modern multifunctional landscape policies in Europe.

## Key findings

- PCA explained 66% of variation in forest management data across European countries.
- Four distinct clusters of countries were identified based on forest management practices.
- CCF application was correlated with policy goals but gaps remain in biodiversity and resilience.

## Abstract

New forest-related policies lead to conflicts among different forest benefits, actors and stakeholders. This requires multiple tools for forest management and landscape planning towards multifunctional landscapes. We first explore if the relative proportions of clearcutting (CC) and continuous cover forestry (CCF) as the two major contrasting traditional forest management systems in Europe can be explained by the complex net effect of biophysical, anthropogenic and social system variables. We then review mismatches between CC and CCF methods, and the tools required by new policies advocating multifunctional forest landscapes. The first three components of a multivariate analysis (PCA) explained 66% of the variation in the dataset. There were four main clusters of countries: (1) Nordic-Baltic boreal, (2) continental temperate lowland, (3) mountain, and (4) southern and southeastern Europe. The incidence of CCF in the 26 countries was correlated to both PC1 and PC2, and a multiple regression explained 53% of the variation in applying CCF. However, key mismatches between the application of CC and CCF and policy about multifunctional landscapes include difficulties to secure biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience. Therefore, new “closer-to-nature” forest management systems and triad landscape planning are also necessary.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CCF (MESH:D014202), root rot (MESH:D005535)
- **Chemicals:** carbon (MESH:D002244), CC (-)
- **Species:** Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine, species) [taxon 3339], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Scolytinae (ambrosia beetles, subfamily) [taxon 55867], Picea abies (Norway spruce, species) [taxon 3329], conifers [taxon 3312], Pinus subgen. Pinus (diploxylon pines, subgenus) [taxon 139271], Rangifer tarandus (caribou, species) [taxon 9870], Pinus sylvestris (Scotch pine, species) [taxon 3349]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905178/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905178/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905178/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12905178