# Mandibular Atrophy and Its Impact on Overdenture Performance: Insights From a 5‐Year Longitudinal Study

## TL;DR

This study found that mandibular atrophy over five years negatively affects chewing performance, satisfaction, and specific prosthetic issues in implant-supported overdenture users.

## Contribution

A longitudinal evaluation of mandibular atrophy's impact on overdenture performance and patient outcomes over five years.

## Key findings

- The AM group showed significant reductions in masticatory performance and swallowing threshold over five years.
- The AM group reported lower chewing satisfaction compared to the non-atrophic group.
- The AM group experienced more frequent prosthetic complications like Equator dislodgement and attachment replacement.

## Abstract

The long‐term influence of mandibular atrophy on masticatory function, patient‐reported outcomes, and prosthetic maintenance in users of implant‐retained overdentures remains unclear.

To assess the impact of mandibular bone atrophy on masticatory function, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and prosthetic maintenance over a five‐year period.

Twenty‐four fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated with mandibular overdentures retained by two narrow‐diameter implants and divided into two groups according to mandibular bone height: atrophic mandible (AM) and non‐atrophic mandible (NAM). Masticatory performance (MP) and swallowing threshold (ST) were assessed, while quality of life and satisfaction were evaluated using the Dental Impact on Daily Living (DIDL) questionnaire. Prosthetic maintenance events were recorded over 5 years. Multilevel mixed‐effects regression evaluated temporal trends and group differences, and chi‐square tests were used for prosthetic events.

Four participants were lost to follow‐up, resulting in 10 individuals per group at 5 years. The AM group showed significant reductions in MP_X50 (–9.66%; p = 0.00) and ST_X50 (–1.9%; p = 0.01); and increase in ST_ME5.6 (+43.32%; p = 0.01). The eating/chewing domain of the DIDL was significantly lower in the AM group (0.35 ± 0.72) compared to the NAM group (0.73 ± 0.47). Although overall prosthetic maintenance did not differ significantly, the AM group exhibited a higher frequency of Equator dislodgement (9.24%; p = 0.00) and attachment replacement (6.02%; p = 0.00).

Mandibular atrophy adversely affected masticatory function, patient‐reported chewing satisfaction, and the frequency of specific prosthetic complications over 5 years.

Overview of the 5‐year follow‐up evaluating how mandibular atrophy influences masticatory function, OHRQoL, satisfaction, and prosthetic maintenance in implant‐retained mandibular overdentures, with objective, sample distribution, methodology, outcomes, and clinical recommendations.