Poster Session I - A75 TOTAL EXAMINATION TIME IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY AND LESION DETECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
S Mitchell, R Djinbachian, J Liu, E Bernard, R Battat, M Bouin, L D’aoust, D C Daoud, E deslandres, R Leduc, P Benoit, K Orlicka, S Bouchard, V Michal, D von Renteln

TL;DR
This study finds that longer upper gastrointestinal endoscopy exams lead to more lesion detection, suggesting a need for time benchmarks similar to colonoscopies.
Contribution
The study establishes a correlation between extended EGD examination time and increased lesion detection in North America, proposing potential quality benchmarks.
Findings
Each additional minute of EGD examination increases odds of detecting significant visual abnormalities by 10.9%.
Detection rates plateau after approximately 13–15 minutes of examination time.
All secondary outcomes showed statistically significant increases in lesion detection with longer examination times.
Abstract
In colonoscopy, longer withdrawal time is an established quality indicator. In contrast, no equivalent benchmark exists for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD), despite evidence from Asian studies suggesting that longer examination time improves neoplasia detection. We aimed to evaluate the association between total EGD examination time and lesion detection in a large North American cohort. We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective study including diagnostic, surveillance, and screening EGDs performed at the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) between November 2023 and August 2025. Procedures with pre-planned polypectomies, interventions and known pathologies (e.g. Barrett’s esophagus) were excluded. Total examination time was measured from endoscope insertion to withdrawal. Detection rates for six abnormality categories (significant visual, significant…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment · Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
