# Mechanical stability and thermodynamic properties of GeP and [image] as battery anode materials from first principles

**Authors:** Duc Toan Truong, Nguyen-Hieu Hoang, Chi M. Phan, An-Giang Nguyen, Thuat T. Trinh

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-36336-1 · Scientific Reports · 2026-01-23

## TL;DR

This study compares different forms of germanium phosphide as potential battery anode materials, finding that GeP3 offers the best balance of mechanical and electronic properties for long-term battery performance.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a first-principles analysis of multiple GeP polymorphs and GeP3, revealing their mechanical and electronic properties for battery applications.

## Key findings

- GeP-cubic is mechanically unstable and unsuitable for practical use.
- GeP3 shows optimal mechanical stiffness and low elastic anisotropy, making it a promising anode material.
- GeP-tetragonal exhibits high stiffness but brittleness, which may limit its cycling durability.

## Abstract

The demand for high-capacity anode materials beyond conventional graphite has intensified research into alternative candidates for next-generation lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Germanium phosphides emerge as promising materials, combining germanium’s high theoretical capacity with phosphorus’s structural versatility and potential for improved cycling stability. We employ first-principles density functional theory calculations to systematically investigate the mechanical, electronic, and thermodynamic properties of three GeP polymorphs (monoclinic, tetragonal, cubic) and rhombohedral \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\hbox {GeP}_{3}$$\end{document} as potential anode materials. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that polymorphism critically influences anode performance through distinct mechanical and electronic characteristics. GeP-cubic exhibits mechanical instability, rendering it unsuitable for practical applications. GeP-tetragonal shows the highest stiffness (bulk modulus 79.4 GPa, Young’s modulus 170.7 GPa) but pronounced brittleness (Pugh’s ratio K/G = 1.06), potentially limiting cycling durability. GeP-monoclinic offers greater mechanical compliance (bulk modulus 32.1 GPa) but suffers from extreme elastic anisotropy (universal anisotropy index A\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$_U$$\end{document} = 7.90), which may lead to non-uniform stress distribution and structural degradation during cycling. In contrast, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\hbox {GeP}_{3}$$\end{document} demonstrates an optimal balance of properties with intermediate mechanical stiffness (bulk modulus 61.0 GPa, Young’s modulus 121.6 GPa), low elastic anisotropy (A\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$_U$$\end{document} = 0.77). Electronic structure calculations reveal metallic conductivity for GeP-tetragonal, GeP-cubic, and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\hbox {GeP}_{3}$$\end{document}, ensuring efficient charge transport during battery operation. These findings establish \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\hbox {GeP}_{3}$$\end{document} as the most promising candidate among the studied materials, offering balanced mechanical resilience, thermal robustness, and isotropic properties essential for stable long-term cycling performance in practical battery applications.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** GRN (granulin precursor) [NCBI Gene 2896] {aka CLN11, FTD2, GEP, GP88, PCDGF, PEPI}
- **Chemicals:** germanium (MESH:D005857), graphite (MESH:D006108), phosphorus (MESH:D010758), lithium (MESH:D008094), sodium (MESH:D012964), Germanium phosphides (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12901247/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12901247/full.md

## References

14 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12901247/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12901247