Poster Session II - A251 REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS, SAFETY, AND DOSE MODIFICATIONS OF UPADACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE: A CANADIAN MULTICENTER STUDY
L M van Lierop, R Dang, T Omeltchenko, M Adriaanse, M Gozdzik, K Kroeker, B Halloran, K Wong, F Peerani, J H Chow, J McCurdy, N Narula, J Siffledeen, L Du, T Dang, C Ma, F Hoentjen

TL;DR
This study examines how well upadacitinib works in real-world treatment of Crohn’s disease in Canada, finding it effective with few serious side effects.
Contribution
The study provides real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in a large, treatment-refractory Crohn’s disease cohort.
Findings
55.3% of patients achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission.
Drug persistence at one year was 73.8%, with serious adverse events being rare.
Upadacitinib was effective even in patients with prior exposure to multiple advanced therapies.
Abstract
Upadacitinib (UPA) is widely used for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) but data on clinical outcomes in daily practice remain scarce. To assess the real-world effectiveness, safety, and dose modifications of UPA in patients with CD. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included adults with CD initiating UPA at 7 Canadian centers (2019/10–2025/04). Patients were followed from treatment start until database lock (June 2025), discontinuation, or loss to follow-up (censored). The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR; HBI <5 off systemic corticosteroids ≥90 days). Biochemical (FCP <250 µg/g and/or CRP <10 mg/L) and endoscopic (SES-CD ≤4) remission rates were captured. We documented adverse events (AEs), analyzed drug persistence by Kaplan–Meier, and evaluated predictors of CFCR by Cox regression. We included 295 patients (mean age 44.9 ± 15.9…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInflammatory Bowel Disease · Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders · Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
