# Research on potential biomarkers of prostate cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review

## TL;DR

This review identifies potential biomarkers for prostate cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean, highlighting regional research trends and disparities.

## Contribution

The study compiles and categorizes 342 potential biomarkers for prostate cancer from LAC, emphasizing regional research gaps.

## Key findings

- 138 studies across 17 LAC countries evaluated 342 potential prostate cancer biomarkers.
- Most studies focused on risk and prognosis biomarkers, with Brazil, Mexico, and Chile leading research.
- Research is concentrated in countries with lower PCa mortality and African ancestry populations.

## Abstract

Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) have higher prostate cancer (PCa) mortality rates than other regions, possibly due to disparities in detection and treatment, as well as differences in tumor biology and behavior. This scoping review aimed to identify studies conducted in LAC that evaluated potential biomarkers associated with PCa.

A search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, LILACS, and Web of Science, including original studies conducted in LAC that evaluated the presence of potential biomarkers in relation to PCa. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a descriptive analysis of the data was performed.

A total of 138 articles were included, evaluating 342 potential biomarkers across 17 countries/territories of LAC. Articles were classified into one or more of the following categories of potential biomarkers: risk of developing PCa (n=74), screening, early detection, and diagnosis (n=13), prognosis (n=48), treatment (n=10) and others (n=12). The countries with the most publications were Brazil, Mexico, and Chile.

Most studies analyzed the relationship between various potential biomarkers and the risk of developing PCa as well as its prognosis. The majority of studies came from continental countries with lower percentages of African ancestry and lower PCa mortality rates, highlighting the need to strengthen research in LAC while improving access to healthcare. Systematic review registration: