# Towards Real-Time Aquatic Monitoring of Strontium-90: Performance Evaluation of CaF2(Eu) and ZnSe(Al,O) Scintillators

**Authors:** Arjana Kolnikaj, Kelum A. A. Gamage, Olaoluwa Popoola, James Graham, Antonio Di Buono

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s26030900 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026-01-29

## TL;DR

Researchers tested two scintillators for real-time monitoring of Strontium-90 in groundwater, finding one more effective for underwater use.

## Contribution

Evaluation of CaF2(Eu) and ZnSe(Al,O) scintillators for Sr-90 monitoring, revealing practical limitations and performance differences.

## Key findings

- ZnSe(Al,O) showed higher detection efficiency (∼61.5%) and good agreement with simulations (R2 ≈ 0.86).
- CaF2(Eu) had lower efficiency (∼22.7%) and poor agreement with simulations (χ2/NDF ≈ 179).
- Practical limitations of readout electronics were identified experimentally but not captured in simulations.

## Abstract

A compact, in situ beta-spectroscopy approach for real-time monitoring of Strontium-90 (Sr-90) in contaminated groundwater has been investigated. Two inorganic scintillators, CaF2(Eu) and ZnSe(Al,O), were coupled to silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) and evaluated experimentally using custom front-end electronics. This was also modelled with Monte Carlo simulations using the Geant4 toolkit. Although simulations correctly predicted ZnSe(Al,O) has an advantage due to its higher light yield and optical transport, experimental measurements additionally revealed practical limitations of the readout electronics which were not captured in the simulation model. ZnSe(Al,O) showed excellent agreement with the simulated detector response (R2 ≈ 0.86; χ2/NDF ≈ 27). It also attains a higher relative detection efficiency (∼61.5%), yielding faithful capture of the composite Sr-90/Y-90 spectrum with only minor suppression at the extreme high-energy tail. CaF2(Eu) exhibits a deficit at low-mid energies and an apparent enhancement in the high-energy tail. This is consistent with threshold and photon-statistics losses and leads to poorer agreement with simulation (χ2/NDF ≈ 179) and lower overall efficiency (∼22.7%). These findings identify ZnSe(Al,O) as the stronger candidate for an underwater, in situ Sr-90 beta-spectroscopy system and motivate targeted optimisation of SiPM coupling and crystal-edge reflectivity in future designs.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Strontium-90 (PubChem CID 5486204)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CNOT8 (CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 8) [NCBI Gene 9337] {aka CAF1, CALIF, Caf1b, POP2, hCAF1}
- **Chemicals:** Eu (MESH:D005063), Y (MESH:D015019), SiPM (-), O (MESH:D010100), silicon (MESH:D012825), Sr-90 (MESH:C000615490), Al (MESH:D000535), ZnSe (MESH:C044696)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899972/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899972/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899972/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899972