# Adaptive Kalman Filter-Based SLAM in LiDAR-Degenerated Environments

**Authors:** Ran Ma, Tao Zhou, Liang Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s26030861 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026-01-28

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new SLAM method using adaptive Kalman filters and particle filters to improve robot positioning accuracy in environments where LiDAR data is unreliable.

## Contribution

The novel SLAM method combines adaptive Kalman filtering with particle filter optimization to enhance robustness in LiDAR-degenerated environments.

## Key findings

- The proposed method improved positioning precision by 61.3–97.9% compared to Karto SLAM.
- Positioning accuracy was enhanced by 35.7–99.0% compared to Hector SLAM.
- The method achieved 43.8–93.0% better performance than Cartographer.

## Abstract

Owing to the low cost, small size, and convenience for installation, 2D LiDAR has been widely used in mobile robots for simultaneous positioning and mapping (SLAM). However, traditional 2D LiDAR SLAM methods have low robustness and accuracy in LiDAR-degenerated environments. To improve the robustness of the SLAM method in such environments, an innovative SLAM method is developed, which mainly includes two parts, i.e., the front-end positioning and the back-end optimization. Specifically, in the front-end part, the AKF (adaptive Kalman filter) method is applied to estimate the pose of the mobile robot, zero bias of acceleration and gyroscope, lever arm length, and the mounting angle. The adaptive factor of the AKF can dynamically adjust the variance of the process and measurement noises based on the residual. In the back-end part, a particle filter (PF) is employed to optimize the pose estimation and build the map, where the pose domain constraint from the output of the front-end is introduced in the PF to avoid mismatch and enhance positioning accuracy. To verify the performance of the method, a series of experiments is carried out in four typical environments. The experimental results show that the positioning precision has been improved by about 61.3–97.9%, 35.7–99.0%, and 43.8–93.0% compared to the Karto SLAM, Hector SLAM, and Cartographer, respectively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899329/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899329/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899329/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12899329