# Quantitative Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Integrity and Authenticity Based on Vegetation in Hanma and Huzhong Reserves

## TL;DR

This study introduces a new method to assess forest ecosystems by separately measuring their integrity and authenticity, using two Chinese reserves as examples.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a framework that decouples and quantifies ecosystem integrity and authenticity using vegetation data.

## Key findings

- Ecosystem authenticity in the study areas was consistently above 90%, indicating strong naturalness.
- Ecosystem integrity was moderate (63–69%) due to limited spatial completeness of conservation units.
- Combining two reserves improved ecosystem integrity without reducing authenticity.

## Abstract

Forest ecosystems provide essential ecological functions in the context of accelerating climate change. However, evaluating their conservation values and conditions remains challenging due to conceptual and methodological ambiguities. In particular, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem authenticity are often conflated in vegetation-based assessments, despite representing distinct dimensions of ecosystem condition. This study advances vegetation-based assessments by explicitly decoupling ecosystem integrity from ecosystem authenticity, while integrating spatial completeness, vegetation patterns and quality, and successional–disturbance attributes into a unified operational framework for reserve-level diagnosis and comparison. The resulting indices enable managers to distinguish boundary-driven limitations of landscape integrity from internal vegetation conditions that persist in near-natural states, thus enhancing interpretability for conservation planning in the context of climate change. Using standardized forest resource survey data and spatial analysis, we constructed two composite indices: Forest Ecosystem Integrity (FEI) and Forest Ecosystem Authenticity (FEA). These indices were applied to two adjacent cold-temperate forest nature reserves, Hanma and Huzhong, in the Greater Khingan Mountains of northeastern China, as well as to a merged spatial scenario. The results demonstrate consistently high ecosystem authenticity (>90%) across all study areas, indicating strong naturalness and successional maturity. In contrast, ecosystem integrity remains moderate (63–69%), primarily constrained by the low spatial completeness of conservation units. The spatial integration of the two reserves significantly improved ecosystem integrity without compromising authenticity, highlighting the role of boundary configuration in conservation effectiveness. By operationalizing integrity and authenticity as complementary yet distinct dimensions, this study provides a reproducible framework for evaluating forest ecosystem conditions and offers practical insights for the design of protected area networks and adaptive management in cold-temperate forest regions.