# The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cellulite: A Systematic Review

## TL;DR

This review shows that ultrasound can effectively diagnose and monitor cellulite by capturing structural changes not visible through traditional methods.

## Contribution

The paper systematically evaluates ultrasound's role in cellulite diagnosis and treatment monitoring, highlighting its potential for integration with AI-based analysis.

## Key findings

- Ultrasound consistently quantifies key structural features of cellulite across various devices and protocols.
- Ultrasound detects microstructural remodeling not visible in clinical exams and shows treatment effects like reduced adipose protrusion.
- Diagnostic ultrasound measures correlate moderately to strongly with clinical severity scores.

## Abstract

Background: Cellulite is a highly prevalent condition with dermal and subcutaneous alterations poorly captured by visual grading systems. Ultrasound has emerged as a non-invasive imaging modality capable of objectively quantifying morphological features relevant to cellulite. This systematic review evaluated the evidence on ultrasound for the diagnosis, structural characterization, and treatment monitoring of cellulite, identifying methodological limitations and research gaps. Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO:CRD420251185486) followed the PRISMA statement. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL up to November 2025. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Nine studies involving 785 participants were included. Ultrasound frequencies ranged from 12 to 35 MHz, with some scanners operating across broader bandwidths. Despite variability in devices, acquisition protocols, and clinical comparators, all studies consistently demonstrated that ultrasound quantifies key structural characteristics of cellulite. Diagnostic investigations reported moderate-to-strong correlations (r ≈ 0.31–0.64) between ultrasound-derived measures and clinical severity scores. Interventional studies showed measurable reductions in dermal and subcutaneous thickness, decreased adipose protrusion height, and improved dermal echogenicity across multiple treatment modalities. Ultrasound frequently detected microstructural remodeling not readily visible on clinical examination. Conclusions: Ultrasound is a valuable imaging modality for objectively characterizing cellulite and monitoring treatment-induced tissue remodeling. Standardized acquisition protocols, validated analytic criteria, and larger controlled studies are needed to support integration into routine dermatologic and esthetic practice. The quantitative and reproducible nature of ultrasound-derived parameters also provides a suitable foundation for future integration with data-driven and artificial intelligence–based image analysis frameworks.