# The Two-Device Problem: A Comprehensive Framework for Managing Transvalvular CIED Leads in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Intervention

**Authors:** Mohammed Hussein Kamareddine, Edward M. Powers, Faisal Rahman, Ali R. Keramati, Konstantinos N. Aronis

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm15031303 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026-02-06

## TL;DR

This paper addresses the challenges of managing heart valve procedures in patients with implanted cardiac devices, emphasizing the need for integrated planning and future research.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a comprehensive framework for managing transvalvular CIED leads during transcatheter tricuspid interventions.

## Key findings

- CIED-associated TR can arise from lead–leaflet impingement, leaflet injury, fibrotic adhesion, pacing-induced remodeling, or infection.
- Moderate-to-severe TR in CIED populations is associated with 1.6- to 2.5-fold increased mortality risk.
- Valve replacement creates obligate lead jailing with implications for lead performance, future extraction feasibility, and infection management.

## Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with transvalvular cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads is increasingly encountered as transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) expand, yet integrated guidance for managing this “two-device problem” remains limited. We performed a focused synthesis of contemporary evidence, organizing findings around mechanisms and diagnosis of TR in the setting of CIED leads, lead–device interactions across TTVI platforms, and clinical trade-offs of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) versus lead preservation or jailing. CIED-associated TR can arise from lead–leaflet impingement, leaflet injury, fibrotic adhesion, pacing-induced remodeling, or infection; true CIED-induced TR accounts for a minority of clinically significant TR, yet progression of TR after lead implantation occurs in 7–45% of patients, and moderate-to-severe TR in CIED populations is associated with 1.6- to 2.5-fold increased mortality risk. Lead conflict and lifetime consequences differ by TTVI modality: repair approaches are generally more lead-tolerant, whereas valve replacement creates obligate lead jailing with implications for lead performance, future extraction feasibility, and infection management. Management of TR with transvalvular CIED leads requires integrated Heart Team planning that anticipates downstream device needs. Standardized TR phenotyping, lead-aware TTVI selection, valve-sparing rhythm-device strategies, and structured post-procedural surveillance may improve outcomes; prospective studies are needed to define optimal extract-versus-jail pathways.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MONDO:0005550)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** TR (MESH:D014262), infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897658/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897658/full.md

## References

86 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897658/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897658