# Staff Wellbeing and Engagement: A Strategic Priority at a Hospital in Singapore

**Authors:** Dorcas Yuen Mei Won, Jolene Wei Ling Ooi, Zhen Wei Lew, Sandra En Ting Tan, Soon Noi Goh

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14030391 · Healthcare · 2026-02-04

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates staff wellbeing and engagement at a Singapore hospital, highlighting the importance of recognition, communication, and psychological safety for healthcare professionals.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into barriers and enablers of staff wellbeing in allied health professionals through a mixed-methods approach.

## Key findings

- 95% of AHPs felt their work was meaningful, but 40.8% did not feel recognized by the organization.
- Approximately 30% of AHPs found higher management unresponsive and communication lacking transparency.
- Qualitative feedback emphasized the need for better remuneration, career progression, and psychological safety.

## Abstract

Background: In today’s dynamic healthcare environment, Changi General Hospital (CGH) has positioned staff wellbeing and engagement as fundamental priorities that underpin workforce sustainability and quality care delivery. Recognizing that allied health professionals (AHPs) face unique emotional demands and potential empathy fatigue, the CGH Allied Health Division (AHD) uses three strategic pillars: individual empowerment, leaders as key stewards and institutional support systems to address staff wellbeing and engagement. This paper will evaluate the outcomes of implementing the programs and identifying the barriers and enablers to achieving staff wellbeing and engagement. Methods: It adopts a mixed-methods approach using both quantitative survey data and qualitative feedback. Results: A total of 314 AHPs participated with a mean employment duration of 8.89 years. While 95% agreed that their work was meaningful and 76.8% reported happiness at work, 40.8% did not experience being recognized by the organization and approximately 30% did not find higher management responsive to their needs or transparent in their communication. Qualitative analysis revealed concerns about psychological safety of sharing one’s opinions and concerns, and a desire for better renumeration and career progression. Conclusions: AHPs reported happiness and meaningfulness in their clinical work. However, issues with organizational recognition, higher management responsiveness and transparency, as well as psychological safety were elicited. Working towards addressing fostering psychological safety and enhancing recognition and communication with management are important in order to develop and sustain a thriving healthcare workforce capable of high-quality patient care. Overall, the findings reinforced AHD direction of putting employee wellbeing and engagement as a strategic priority.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fatigue (MESH:D005221)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897088/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897088/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897088/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12897088