# Advancing Bongkrekic Acid Detection: From Conventional Instrumental Analysis to Advanced Biosensing for Cross-Toxin Applications

**Authors:** Zhen Chen, Danni He, Wenhan Yu, Xianshu Fu, Lingling Zhang, Mingzhou Zhang, Xiaoping Yu, Zihong Ye

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/foods15030476 · Foods · 2026-01-30

## TL;DR

This paper reviews current and emerging methods for detecting bongkrekic acid, a dangerous toxin, and suggests new strategies inspired by techniques used for other toxins.

## Contribution

The paper introduces the idea of cross-applying detection methods from other toxins to improve bongkrekic acid sensing.

## Key findings

- Instrumental methods like HRMS offer high sensitivity but are costly and lab-based.
- Biosensors and immunoassays allow rapid on-site detection but face stability and specificity issues.
- Future methods could use nanobodies, CRISPR-based amplification, and integrated platforms for better detection.

## Abstract

Bongkrekic acid (BKA), a highly lethal toxin, has been implicated in frequent poisoning incidents in recent years, posing a serious threat to global food safety and creating an urgent need for rapid and sensitive detection methods. This review provides a systematic analysis of the entire BKA detection technologies, covering sample pretreatment techniques, instrumental analysis, immunoassays, and biosensing methods. It assesses the merits of key methods and also explores the strategic cross-application of detection paradigms developed for analogous toxins. This review delivers a comprehensive and critical evaluation of BKA detection technologies. First, it discusses sample pretreatment strategies, notably solid-phase extraction (SPE) and QuEChERS. Subsequently, it analyzes the principles, performance, and applications of core detection methods, including high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA), dual-mode immunosensors and nanomaterial-based sensors. Instrumental methods (e.g., HRMS) offer unmatched sensitivity [with a limit of detection (LOD) as low as 0.01 μg/kg], yet remain costly and laboratory-dependent. Immunoassay and biosensor approaches (TRFIA and dual-mode sensors) enable rapid on-site detection with high sensitivity (ng/mL to pg/mL), though challenges in stability and specificity remain. Looking forward, the development of next-generation BKA detection could be accelerated by cross-applying cutting-edge strategies proven for toxins—such as Fumonisin B1 (FB1), Ochratoxin A (OTA), and Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)—including nanobody technology, CRISPR-Cas-mediated signal amplification, and multimodal integrated platforms. To translate this potential into practical tools, future research should prioritize the synthesis of high-specificity recognition elements, innovative signal amplification strategies, and integrated portable devices, aiming to establish end-to-end biosensing systems capable of on-site rapid detection through multitechnology integration.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** bongkrekic acid (PubChem CID 6433556), Fumonisin B1 (PubChem CID 2733487), Ochratoxin A (PubChem CID 442530), Aflatoxin B1 (PubChem CID 186907)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** poisoning (MESH:D011041)
- **Chemicals:** OTA (MESH:C025589), BKA (MESH:D001865), AFB1 (MESH:D016604), FB1 (MESH:C056933)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12896814/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12896814/full.md

## References

111 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12896814/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12896814