Comparative evaluation of molecular technologies for the identification of prevalent non-tuberculous mycobacteria in pulmonary infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiang Chen, Jiawen Sun, Xibin Chen, Yanshan You, Leonardo Antonio Sechi, Paola Molicotti

TL;DR
This study evaluates molecular methods for identifying non-tuberculous mycobacteria in lung infections and finds they are highly accurate, though performance varies with sample type.
Contribution
The study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing molecular technologies for NTM identification and reports global antibiotic resistance patterns.
Findings
Molecular technologies like MALDI-TOF MS, PCR, and sequencing show high sensitivity (>0.92) for NTM species identification.
Sample type significantly affects the performance of MALDI-TOF MS in NTM identification.
Antibiotic resistance rates vary widely, with high Ethambutol resistance in M. avium and Imipenem resistance in rapidly growing mycobacteria.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM PD) is a burden to public health. Successful management of NTM PD critically depends on accurate species identification and reliable drug susceptibility testing to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy. Emerging molecular technologies offer rapid diagnostic solutions compared to conventional methods, but their performance varies. This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of current molecular techniques for NTM identification and to present a global antibiotic resistance profile. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science for studies published between 2005 and 2024. Studies applying molecular methods for NTM identification and resistance detection in humans were included. Data on study characteristics, diagnostic methods, sample types, sample sizes, identification…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMycobacterium research and diagnosis · Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology · Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
