# Does solo publication still make sense? Single-authored publications have been essential to scientific progress but are now facing extinction

**Authors:** Valentí Rull

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s44319-025-00677-1 · 2025-12-16

## TL;DR

Solo-authored scientific papers are becoming rare but historically important, and preserving them is valuable for scientific progress.

## Contribution

The paper highlights the declining trend of solo-authored publications and argues for their continued relevance and protection.

## Key findings

- Solo papers have declined significantly over the last century.
- Solo papers have historically been influential and disruptive in science.
- Preserving solo papers is seen as beneficial for scientific innovation.

## Abstract

Solo papers (SPs) have experienced a sustained decline over the last century, which has turned them into a residual publication type. However, SPs have traditionally been highly influential and disruptive, and efforts to protect them from extinction are worthwhile.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** NMS (MESH:D012893), SSH (MESH:D001734)
- **Species:** Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940], Sphingomonas sp. SH (species) [taxon 849864]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12894964/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12894964