# Deception Affects Interbrain Electroencephalographic and Autonomic Synchronization Within a Dyad: A Hyperscanning Study

## TL;DR

This study shows that deception affects brain and heart synchronization between two people during an interview, suggesting a new way to detect lies using two-person neuroscience.

## Contribution

The study introduces a two-person neuroscience approach to deception by analyzing interbrain and autonomic synchronization during an ecological mock crime task.

## Key findings

- Deception group showed higher interbrain synchronization in theta and alpha bands compared to the non-deception group.
- Heart rate synchrony in the high frequency band was reduced in the deception group.
- Increased interbrain synchronization in the deception group involved the left temporal area of the interviewee.

## Abstract

Research on deception has focused on the neurophysiological assessment of the deceiver, showing activation of specific brain areas and increased autonomic activity. However, deception is an interpersonal process where both the deceiver and the deceived interact in a constant process of evaluation that requires demanding cognitive resources. The present study aimed to investigate interbrain synchronization (IBS) and heart rate synchrony between an interviewer intent on detecting deception and an interviewee during a deception (deception group, or DG) or truth‐telling (non‐deception group, or NDG) task using an ecological mock crime experiment. The results showed that DG exhibited higher IBS before the interview in the theta band and during the interview in the alpha band, while displaying decreased heart rate synchrony in the high frequency band compared to NDG. The greater IBS in DG involved, particularly, the left temporal area of the interviewee. These findings highlight the relevance of studying deception according to a two‐person neuroscience perspective, suggesting that while neural processes are synchronized before and during a deceptive interaction, autonomic processes follow different activation patterns. Integrating the hyperscanning techniques with existing lie‐detection methods could enhance the identification of neurophysiological markers of deception.

The deception group (DG) exhibited higher inter‐brain synchronization (IBS) before the interview in a theta band cluster and during the interview in an alpha band cluster, while displaying decreased heart rate synchrony (HRS) in the high frequency band compared to the non‐deception group (NDG). The findings highlight the importance of a two‐person neuroscience perspective in identifying neurophysiological markers of deception.